ThomasMuentzner [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net to news@hexbear.netEnglish · 4 months agoTrump shot ?x.comexternal-linkmessage-square377fedilinkarrow-up1206arrow-down11cross-posted to: main@hexbear.net
arrow-up1205arrow-down1external-linkTrump shot ?x.comThomasMuentzner [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net to news@hexbear.netEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square377fedilinkcross-posted to: main@hexbear.net
minus-squareRedDawn [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·4 months agoYour reasoning seems pretty backwards, “there’s no evidence he did it, so he probably did” is what your comment reads like.
minus-squareRyanGosling [none/use name]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-24 months agoThe reasoning that “the CIA carried out a complex assassination plot and failed to place witnesses to implicate a patsy” is dumber
minus-squareRedDawn [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 months agoNo it’s not. All of the evidence points to that being the case. Is it possible you’re just not familiar with the facts of the case?
Your reasoning seems pretty backwards, “there’s no evidence he did it, so he probably did” is what your comment reads like.
The reasoning that “the CIA carried out a complex assassination plot and failed to place witnesses to implicate a patsy” is dumber
No it’s not. All of the evidence points to that being the case. Is it possible you’re just not familiar with the facts of the case?