• communism
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    5 months ago

    My “I haven’t been hacked by gay furries” T-shirt has people asking a lot of questions already answered by my T-shirt

        • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Wacky sitcom shenanigans are a given :p

          I once moved into an apartment with three other gay furries (one being an old friend), and another joined us shortly after. Two bedroom, one bath, and 5 furs. Playing reverse jenga with the trash can (whoever tips it, takes it out) and occasionally walking around nude were just par for the course. Using paper towels as emergency tp, and hearing the couple who were the actual renters getting frisky in the shower, were less common but not unexpected. And I ordered pizza so often that we got on a first-name basis with the delivery guy. Getting naughty with the friend was nice, too, when my bf wasn’t visiting (we were open).

          Oh, and it was my first time living through a proper winter. Waking up to see my friend had left the window open, and the world a textureless white, was a nightly thing. I’m too cold, he’s too hot, screams. I ended up running stress tests on my computer to generate heat, and we settled on a mostly-closed window policy.

          Life now is mundane by comparison. Though I’m in a master/pet relationship with the friend, he’s got a bf, and there’s been talk of moving in together, so… History kinda repeats itself? I’m okay with pizza-box trash jenga and being nude again. :P

      • RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Satire done right is close enough to reality to make you pause for a second and wonder, “Is this for real?”

        Stands to reason that it works the other way too.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Why? The Heritage Foundation are an intellectual joke. They can’t win in the war of ideas, they can’t suggest ideas that will last any test of time, and now are actively working to make their whim law crushing democracy itself. So if they are a joke why not mock them?

        Against the assault of laughter, nothing can stand

        Mark Twain

        And in this event is the seeds to beat the bastards. They want us to be scared they want us to take them seriously. Some group of script kiddies made them say gay furries. To actually go out there and talk about gay furries. Serious men in serious suits saying gay furries.

        Keep it up. Make them talk about sex toys, pointless fandom debates, body fluids, anything that brings them down to the level of mockery

  • Pistcow@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    5 months ago

    As much of the IT sector makes up that group I’m surprised more breaches like this haven’t happened.

    • finley@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Just because you haven’t heard of them, doesn’t mean they don’t happen more often than you think

      Vigilante hacker groups don’t necessarily need public attention to get satisfaction

      • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Oh, it’s true. Even without any unlawful computer access, the amount of personal info your average IT furry can access is pretty astounding. There’s furries quietly keeping things running in the background across tech, finance, industry, science, and just about everywhere.

        Our Bacon numbers are tiny, too. It might be six degrees for any two random humans, but in the furry community you rarely have to go farther than friend-of-a-friend-of-a-friend-of-a-friend.

        So; if you’ve got a problem, if nobody else can help, and if you can find them, maybe you can hire… A Furry.

      • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        From what I’ve heard, sometimes the hacked institutions bow in the form of delaying, or even completely ditching Project 2025-style plans. Other times the institution has enough Russia and/or China ties, that a naive tankie within the group sabotages the whole effort. Yet other times they’re being paid a lot of money and being given certain guarantees (ability of leaving the country in case the hacker’s civil identities become illegal, etc.).

  • isaaclyman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    “I’m not owned! I’m not owned!” I continue to insist as I slowly shrink and transform into a corn cob

  • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    The information obtained was limited to usernames, names, email addresses, and incomplete password information of both Heritage and non-Heritage content contributors, as well as article comments and the IP address of the commenter. No Heritage systems were breached at any time, and all Heritage databases and websites remain secure, including Project 2025. The data at issue has been taken down, and additional security steps have since been taken as a precaution.

    So you’re saying that there was no breach at heritage because… you gave away your users data to a contractor?

    • Jojo, Lady of the West@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah, what a cop out.

      We weren’t hacked, guys! It was just our data specifically that was hacked from the contractors we pay to protect it! That’s totally different and better, right?

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 months ago

    Do you think there’s a real link between furries being gay, like the type of person who is a furry just tends to be disproportionately gay and online?

    Or a sociological link like people who are open enough about sexual preferences will tend to be open about all of them?

    Or a news bias link like plenty of hackers are gay but you don’t hear about it, but if they are

    Or is this always just the one gay furry hacker group?

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think it’s about lines of social taboo. Coming out as gay means you’ve already done something socially difficult, and it means you’re closer to social fringes. It’s what I’ve always suspected for why queer people, polyamorous people, and people into bdsm wind up overlapping more than expected.

    • Laurentide@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s because the furry fandom, when it was founded back in the late 70’s by a gay polycule of sci-fi fans, was one of the only communities in existence that accepted openly gay and trans people. (And the only non-fetish community.) For many queer people, the furry fandom is the first place they ever feel welcome.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Basically the two weird kids in school decided to hangout together? I don’t mean that in a bad way, I mean in a cute way.

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      There seems to be a link between neurodivergence and LGBTQ+ tendencies, from purely anecdotal evidence. Perhaps it’s because neurodivergent people seem to be more willing to question the status quo and self-examine without the assumption that they must be however society deems “normal?”

    • nik9000@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think all those are a little true. But I’m mostly guessing. I’m happy to change my mind if anyone knows better.

      Either way, these folks are my hero.

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Do you think there’s a real link between furries being gay, like the type of person who is a furry just tends to be disproportionately gay and online?

      there’s a disposition between gay people and being furries, not between being furry, and being gay.

      It’s a little weird, but it’s just a technicality of the furry community being the way that it is. It’s the same reason the US government is 90% people above the age of 60 right now. It’s just demographic shenanigans.

  • finley@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Go on Barbara, keep telling us not to look at Internet pictures of you

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    A group of self-proclaimed “gay furry hackers” says it breached the Heritage Foundation earlier this month, releasing two gigabytes of the right-wing think tank’s internal data on Tuesday.

    The group also cited their objections to Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation’s policy proposal for a second term for former President Donald Trump, as a motivating factor.

    The chat logs show a person who claims to be Howell asking a SiegedSec member why the group hacked the Heritage Foundation and threatening to expose the hackers.

    In a statement on Telegram, SiegedSec said the goal of the hack was to draw attention to — and combat — the Heritage Foundation’s anti-LGBT and anti-abortion policy proposals.

    Broadly speaking, its recommendations involve expanding presidential power, purging federal agencies of career employees, and replacing them with Trump loyalists.

    Trump recently attempted to distance himself from Project 2025, claiming he has “no idea” who is behind the plan — even though a CNN analysis found that more than 140 former members of his administration were involved in drafting the mandate.


    The original article contains 834 words, the summary contains 173 words. Saved 79%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!