☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.ml to news@hexbear.netEnglish · 2 months agoNY Times just casually dropped that the official U.S. intelligence assessment has always been that Putin didn't want to expand the Ukraine conflict beyond Ukrainelemmygrad.mlimagemessage-square208fedilinkarrow-up1243arrow-down15file-textcross-posted to: worldnews@lemmygrad.ml
arrow-up1238arrow-down1imageNY Times just casually dropped that the official U.S. intelligence assessment has always been that Putin didn't want to expand the Ukraine conflict beyond Ukrainelemmygrad.ml☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.ml to news@hexbear.netEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square208fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: worldnews@lemmygrad.ml
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/01/us/politics/us-bases-alert-level-russia.html https://archive.ph/laVgN
minus-squarepelletbucket@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·edit-22 months agoI didn’t comment on the post to refute it, I replied to a comment to refute the comment. that’s how threads work. anyway comment: “Did libs really think Putin was gonna try and pull an Ögedei Khan and try to take Europe?” me: this lib certainly said he thought so. that’s how conversations work.
minus-squareShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·edit-22 months agoHe also said he’d seen photographic proof that Hamas had decapitated 40 babies. He also said he would cure cancer, I am not joking.
minus-squareDiuretic_Materialism [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·2 months ago this lib certainly said he thought so. Most of us are pretty skeptical he actually did think so, especially considering a lot of experts in his circle have said things that contradict it. Case in point: the article being discussed.
minus-squareTomorrow_Farewell [any, they/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down1·2 months ago I didn’t comment on the post to refute it, I replied to a comment to refute the comment And all you did is support - not refute - the comment. Just as I said here: Considering that Biden is a lib, your reply, at best, supports the comment that you were replying to comment: “Did libs really think Putin was gonna try and pull an Ögedei Khan and try to take Europe?” me: this lib certainly said he thought so. Case in point.
minus-squarepelletbucket@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agojesus kid. I’m out. good god
minus-squareTomorrow_Farewell [any, they/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·2 months agoHaha. It’s nice that you recognise how much you embarrassed yourself.
I didn’t comment on the post to refute it, I replied to a comment to refute the comment. that’s how threads work. anyway
comment: “Did libs really think Putin was gonna try and pull an Ögedei Khan and try to take Europe?”
me: this lib certainly said he thought so.
that’s how conversations work.
He also said he’d seen photographic proof that Hamas had decapitated 40 babies.
He also said he would cure cancer, I am not joking.
go on
No u
Most of us are pretty skeptical he actually did think so, especially considering a lot of experts in his circle have said things that contradict it. Case in point: the article being discussed.
And all you did is support - not refute - the comment. Just as I said here:
Case in point.
jesus kid. I’m out. good god
Haha. It’s nice that you recognise how much you embarrassed yourself.