Do you agree? Why? Why not? Do you have an alternative suggestion?

    • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly…

      1. Does your package manager (apt/yum/portage/etc) install the correct gpu drivers?
      2. Does the package manager install steam + dependencies?

      If yes to both, you have a gaming distro

  • kronarbob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s the same list we see years after years… They didn’t even bother to add Nobara, which is probably, one of the few “gamer distro” that include that many useful patches for gaming…

  • cujo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I actually really like openSUSE Tumbleweed for gaming, personally. It’s rolling release, keeps up-to-date with the latest feature and security releases, and manages to be far more stable than any other rolling release I’ve tried, and I’ve tried my fair share lol.

    It does require a little extra work at the beginning to get all your stuff sorted out – non-free drivers and libraries, though they’re easier to get access to than ever – but once that’s done, it’s largely minimal tinkering to get games up and running on Steam or Lutris or Bottles or whatever else launcher you choose to use. I was running Elden Ring the day it dropped and all I had to do was switch to ProtonGE, for example, and while that’s not the greatest achievement ever I think it’s pretty great.

    Valve has really done a lot of good work though, and using most Linux distros to game seems largely trivial compared to how it used to be.

    • xtapa@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I switched to Linux recently and been researching on Distros for weeks with tables and stuff. I decided for Tumbleweed with KDE and it just feels so good. Wrote some scripts so I can run a system update with pre and post snapshots and a restart and it gives me so much confidence to tinker around and learn more about Linux. Snapshots in general are just so damn great.

  • Willex@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Instead of Manjaro, I’d recommend EndeavourOS which does basically the same thing but doesn’t have the history of being dodgy and unprofessional.

    • puhaah
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      so true. i geniunely dont understand why a lot of people recommend manjaro when it has so many issues and there’s other much better distros

  • oldlamps@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve kind of shifted my thinking on all this over the past year. I used to use Arch since I wanted bleeding edge access to features. This would always eventually leads to something breaking, and headaches fixing.

    I’ve since been using pop_os, and moving over to the flatpak and NixOS ecosystems to stay on top of the latest package versions, while having a more stable and tested base. It’s working for me, I don’t worry about my system borking all the time, and I get plenty of new package updates to satisfy that want.

  • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yeah, no. Maybe if you are using a Nvidia card and are stuck on older Linux kernel versions.

    Otherwise Fedora is a great choice. It comes with different editions, but IMHO the KDE version is the best.

  • Matt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Does it even matter what distribution you use?

    I gamed on Debian 11 (now 12) with no issues at all on an nvidia card.

    I feel like any distro can do gaming well, the only thing a distro can offer now is having things set up out of the box for you (Novara being a prime example of this).

  • visnudeva
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Without copying and pasting what’s on every linux websites for the past 10 years with only changing the year and talking from personal experience i get great results on fedora silverblue.

  • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wouldn’t really consider any specific distro as being the best for gaming. As long as it provides an up to date kernel and libraries, it will work well. Just don’t use a DE that takes up a lot of VRAM or GPU power.

  • Bear@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They don’t mention Nobara, a distribution of Fedora made by Glorious Eggroll, who does great work on proton. I had Pop Os, tried a fee others that were Ubuntu base, but nothing has been as good as Nobara.

  • sleepyTonia@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Pop!OS aside, are Ubuntu and its derivatives’ users still stuck looking up PPAs and tutorials to get the latest drivers for Nvidia GPUs?

  • Morgikan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Distro doesn’t matter (as has been stated since the dawn of time it seems). A better question would be something like “Which do you prefer: RADV or AMDVLK?” or “What DE/WM do you prefer gaming on?”.

    The DE/WM is probably a good one simply because I like gaming in a window (not fullscreen) but still want get a fullscreen appearance without titlebars/borders. i3wm is great for that.