• Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    165
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    5 months ago

    I do, but like most other people, I’m preoccupied with short term crises since, well, I need to survive those in order to be ready for the long-term ones.

    In my opinion though, we don’t stand a snowball’s chance in hell. The elite will manage to hang just a bit longer, but eventually they’ll cook and burn with the rest of us, or in their bunkers.

    Anyways, shit’s already fucked to the point that I’ve given up. Just sit back, relax and take whatever life gives ya.

    • xionzui@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      106
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      This is exactly the messaging of the oil companies and others who oppose climate action now that it’s too hard to deny. They want us to think it’s hopeless and give up trying to change anything. It’s not too late. Green energy is growing exponentially and has been possibly the fastest technological adoption in history. Millions of people are working on the science and technology to solve these problems. We just need some more collective action at the local and national levels. Carbon taxes, funding for green initiatives, local agriculture, and support for alternative transportation like e-bikes or other PEVs to start

      • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        47
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        5 months ago

        Did you miss the memo that current AI is already using more power than everything we’ve managed to save with green energy in the last decade? We ARE fucked, the only thing we’re still debating is the exact timespan. Which is asinine, the result will remain the same either way.

        The only way I see to a path to salvation is a huge pandemic or world war, becausing nothing else will convince people. We’ve been trying (and failing) for decades.

        • w2tpmf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          30
          ·
          5 months ago

          The only way I see to a path to salvation is a huge pandemic or world war

          Good news! The odds are looking pretty high for both of those!

        • rsuri@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Carbon taxes fix the problem of using energy for dumb things. Climate change isn’t caused by us using energy, it’s caused by the fact that carbon pollution is free.

        • nehal3m@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I need some anon to write me a virus that will wipe out all datacenters in one go, something that will irrevocably fry all enterprise hardware beyond repair. Let’s start over, with decent trust busting and without the plastic this time.

          (edit: I guess it’s not entirely clear but I’m expecting such a virus to hit the reset button on civilisation. Mass death, yes, but we won’t fuck the world beyond being liveable.)

          • alsimoneau@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Because that power could have been used by someone else who’s depending on coal instead. You cannot separate power sources when on the grid.

        • illi@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          The only way I see to a path to salvation is a huge pandemic or world war, becausing nothing else will convince people

          We had a pandemic already and war in Ukraine is raging on - and both only served right wing extremists to rise and ignore climate problems even harder. We are fucked. I don’t give up hope but it’s tiny

        • notfromhere
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          Necessity is the mother of invention, and new technology is only going to continue to use more and more energy. Conservation is not the answer.

        • spaduf@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          Did you miss the memo that current AI is already using more power than everything we’ve managed to save with green energy in the last decade?

          You got a source on that? Cause that sounds fake

        • jaybone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I keep saying, if Putin starts a nuclear war, we might save humanity. A nuclear winter will cool the planet. And with most of us dying of radiation poisoning, we won’t have the ability to start pumping more CO2 into the atmosphere. Yay!

          • nnullzz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            No, there’s always a shimmer of hope and the non zero chance that we mean something for someone that could make a difference, or help make the difference ourselves. Even sometimes the tiniest good-hearted gesture will do it.

      • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        If solving the problem becomes impossible, the backup plan should be retribution, not complacency. That way they have an incentive to work with us.

    • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I never had kids of my own, because I didn’t want any, but the last 15 years or so I’ve becoming increasingly grateful that I made that decision. It at least allows me to sit back and contemplate doom without worrying about what my kids’ life on this planet is going to be like after I’m gone.

      I’ve always done the reducing, reusing, and recycling, because it’s the right thing to do. Cut waaaaay back on dairy and beef purchases, I eat a lot of plant protein and use plant milk now. But it’s all a drop in the bucket. Only the governments can actually fix this, and they won’t because they are owned. I just sit around hoping it won’t get TOO bad before I’m dead.

      • RuBisCO@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        The fiduciary responsibility scene from the new Fallout show hit hard.

        S1E6

        “Morton played a rancher who owned half of Missouri.”

        “And what happens when the cattle ranchers have more power than the sheriff?”

        “The whole town burns down.”

        “Right, the whole town burns down. Vault-Tec is a trillion dollar company that owns half of everything. And after ten years of war, the U.S. gov’t is broker than a joke. The cattle ranchers are in charge, Coop.”

    • Strider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      5 months ago

      I agree and I am not even preoccupied, but there simply hasn’t been any chance for me to make a dent in this. Hasn’t been for a long time, at least since 1900 (!!) where we basically already knew where everything was headed.

    • CobblerScholar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Humanity is just going to go through a culling. There will definitely be humans and there will definitely be habitable areas of the planet but there won’t be room for all 8 billion of us and depending on how much we actually do right now will determine how big the actual final number is

      • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        5 months ago

        And honestly, would that be such a bad thing? 8 freaking billion of us is at least 7.5B too many.

        • felbane@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 months ago

          People who say this imagine themselves and their families in the 0.5B but will end up in the 7.5B, suffering immeasurably in the process.

          • Krauerking@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Nah I tried to get as close to the cities I think would be bombed so that I can go out in a puff of ozone

          • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Nope, there’s nothing special about me or my family. We’re just insignificant eurotrash. Odds we’d be among the survivors are very low.

          • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Actually yes, but that has more to do with 20 years of crippling depression and chronic pain than the coming climate disasters.

    • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      I do what I can. It’s certainly not as much as I could be doing, but it’s what I have the mental and emotional capacity to handle. I don’t have a ton of hope either, and it’s a big reason I decided not to have children, but I wouldn’t say I’ve given up completely.

    • TehWorld@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      Actually, no! Once the really BIG human die-offs start, the hyperwealthy will ‘bunker up’ for a while and once the population shrinks back down, we won’t be putting out all that greenhouse gas anymore, and the earth will cool back down. They’ll keep a few cities in places like Norway or what have you around to keep providing food and fuel for their choppers and parties.

        • jaybone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I know several billionaires are already doing this in Hawaii. I feel like Hawaii is a bad choice. But I suppose if you have a giant yacht it’s not a problem.

          But I feel like you’d want land with slaves under armed guard that till fields and raise livestock.

            • jaybone@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              I was thinking you keep your security as part of the elite class, they would live basically as well as you and your other elites family / friend class. Maybe even with arranged marriages to ensure their offspring will be part of this same class, like royalty. You could build this into your society/culture. Maybe serving as a guard is like something every royal does for five or ten years.

                • jaybone@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  That’s why I was thinking you somehow make them a part of the hoarding class, disincentivizing them from mutiny, as they are also benefitting from those hoarded resources in the same way as you and your family. But yeah it’s a hard problem to solve for the hoarder.

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      121
      ·
      5 months ago

      The people who tweeted this suck at Communication 101. You’ve gotta have a specific and clear call to action. Something like “Join this protest at XYZ” or “Demand your Congressman support ABC.”

      You can’t just say “Drop everything. Forget about your job and your kid’s education.” That’s not an effective message.

      Unless their point is we’re past the point of protests and political policies doing anything and we’re all gonna die. In which case, say that. “Drop everything and go die, cause we’re fucked.” You gotta be clear!

      • InFerNo
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I think part of the post is the implication that there is no more call to action, only a downward spiral that no action could solve.

      • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah there’s a good chunk of this country that would react to this kind of message by heading to the gun store to stock up. Not exactly helpful.

      • jaybone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        If we take it at face value, it would seem the audience they are targeting would not care to participate in xyz and would not care to ask the congressman to vote abc, probably because those things are not in their own financial interest. But that’s not actually who this is targeting. It’s targeting the rest of us, who are already aware of those people. But we can’t do anything about it.

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      No Man’s Sky just got a cool update, so I think I’m gonna play that while I await my doom.

    • Wooki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Drop and roll.

      Jokes aside, go outside, touch grass, plant some trees. Rinse and repeat

  • TheFriar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    109
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I mean, I get the desperation. But drop everything and…do what?

    Calling for a massive strike is one thing. But just “drop everything” with no follow up is a weird reaction. It sounds way too much like, “drop everything and panic.” Not “sacrifice everything to try to save what we can of the livable world.”

    • kromem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Drop everything and enjoy life while it lasts.

      It may be shorter than you were planning on.

    • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      either travel until your last penny or buy a house in a very very remote location and stockpile enough food for a year or two. Continuing your life as usual and recycling your tin cans is the definition of insanity.

      • masterspace@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        If your bucket list is “travel the world” then sure. If your bucket list is “enjoy a lot of chill times with my friends and family” then I don’t really know what you expect to change.

        I mean think of how many people know someone who died young and live with the very real knowledge that they could die at any moment, what do you expect them to change knowing that climate change might make life hard at some point in the next 2 - 100 years? Does that meaningfully change someone’s life when they already know that they could be killed in a car accident the next day?

      • secretlyaddictedtolinux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Do you think preparing for collapse now in a remote location is really the sensible thing to do? I sometimes wonder myself how fast it will happen. I think the planet will be uninhabitable within 300 years and chaos will ensue within 30 but i’m not sure the chaos will be without warning unless we hit an environmental tipping point and there’s sudden major temperature change (like earth becoming 20 degrees warmer or cooler within a week), which could happen.

        • ameancow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          If you’re at all capable, purchase property up north. You can get acres of undeveloped land for a few thousand dollars. If you can, have an ongoing project to get some basic services set up on the land like a secure shed to cover a well and a solar kit. Get an RV or a van and just know that if shit falls apart you can drive out there and at least have water and power. Wireless or satellite internet would be a good idea.

          The coming disasters are going to take a number of years to ramp up, it will probably happen slowly enough that people will almost literally be the toad boiling to death as the heat slowly rises. It could be a few years, it could be a few decades. Whatever happens, it will happen and it will get worse. We’re going to see the most drastic change to our world that anyone has ever seen and a lot of people are going to suffer and it’s going to happen at the same pace which we read about school shootings, annoyance and impatience.

          Most of us won’t be able to afford land and even if we do move to cooler, less unstable areas, we still may have to deal with food shortages, economic crashes, and social instability. It’s not going to be like The Road, we’re not going into a sudden world of cannibals and post-apocalyptic fashion choices, it’s going to be a long slog through more and more discomfort, storms that don’t let up on coastal cities, political drama as people try to move or get federal help, refugees swamping places that can’t handle the numbers, authoritarians trying to seize power, crime and looting in the aftermath of storms, cities slowly becoming abandoned as the flood waters never get a chance to recede, as happened in some parts of New Orleans as long ago as Katrina.

            • ameancow@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              No, but again, I’m not talking about a hollywood drama here, this is real life, “collapse” is a thing that exists on a spectrum and can change radically depending on what the political powers do. Nations may restructure, there even may be fighting, but short of an actual nuclear holocaust it’s not likely that we’re going to see a scorched-earth wasteland.

              Everyone on both sides of this are really hyped to the extremes, but there is no telling how the next several decades may pan out, it’s not a bad idea to have some ideas that may benefit you, if you think you have better ideas for how to prepare, do share. If you are worried and hopeless and think nothing we do matters, that’s obviously not a great mindset to have, we have lifetimes ahead of us and people who are going to make it through, we have a responsibility still to try to do the best we can with what we have.

              edit: love that balanced and nuanced takes are making people seeth. Look, just believe whatever you want. The Earth doesn’t care and what’s going to happen will happen. If you rather believe it’s going to be exactly, 100% identical to the Fallout universe and you wanna imagine walking the wasteland, you do you, king.

    • Maalus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Well, if everybody dropped everything then emissions would go to 0 soooo nothing I guess

    • Xerxos
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Well, the only thing that could reasonably help us would be to demolish the 1% and the corrupt politicians who support them. And yes, that would include an armed uprising.

      Not that that I see that happening unless it gets much worse. We still have (some) bread and games left to pacify the masses.

    • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      I will add another case of emergency food to my garage, finally get that Costco membership and buy some gold, and grab a bit more ammunition. Do some more research about buying land off the grid.

  • Daxtron2@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Yeah I’ve understood since high school, what the fuck do you want me to do about it when I can barely keep myself and my family alive as is?

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      This particular author wants you to panic.

      We are certainly facing many environmental crisis, there’s no doubt about that… But the data here seems limited. I assume we simply don’t have measurements older than 50 years to add to this graph?

      Edit: Here is a better graph!

      Still alarming, but the data only goes back so far… It feels like something everyone needs to pay attention to and take seriously, but perhaps turning down the Vault-Tec guy knocking at your door is still a reasonable action to take.

      • RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        Seems like the authors doomerism is working. Look at some of the assholes in the comments. It feels like they get off of the negativity.

        Is shit bad? Yeah. But giving up helps no one and is a punch in the face to all the people that are fighting tooth and nail every single day.

      • Daxtron2@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        That graph is 4 years out of date and still shows the same thing, if we don’t make radical changes, we’re fucked.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          We’re fucked no matter what, but the degree of the fucking is in question still. 1.5 degrees is not great, 2.5 is really bad. 4 degrees is civilization-ending catastrophe.

          And good news! We’ve probably averted 4 degrees through our actions over the last 20-40 years or so. Iirc we’re still on track for 2-3 degrees. We have more work to do.

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    109
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    Okay. I just want to slam on the brakes here, just a little… Just a little slam.

    There’s a LOT of personal blame going around in these comments. As if everyone who ever had burned any fossil fuels ever is somehow personally responsible for everything that’s currently happening.

    Here’s some news, we’ve been burning shit for more than a millennia. People, in and of themselves, don’t require so much heat and energy to create a problem. At least not individually. As a whole, small problem. Individually, microscopic problem at most.

    Everyone seems to have fallen into this trap of everyone being personally responsible for the climate change. The vast majority of the issue is companies. Everyone wants to point at trucks and delivery vehicles and whatnot as major contributors when they do talk about contributions from companies, and you’re still way off base. It’s not even the air traffic that’s the problem. It’s the fucking boats. Nobody thinks about it, because nobody sees it. Either the boats are off at sea, or they’re docked in some yard, away from your vision. 90% of the time, they’re sailing. When they’re sailing, they’re operating the motors 24/7. Each ship, when operating, will consume more fuel in an hour than any one person would use in a year.

    Since it’s mostly unregulated international waters, who are they reporting any of that shit to? So they don’t.

    Yes. Climate change is real. Yes, we, personally, should be doing what we can to curb it. The fact is, if all of us did everything possible (switching to all renewable power, using EVs and all renewable powered appliances, etc) it would barely make a dent. All of the “personal responsibility” arguments are just a smokescreen from the big, very guilty corporations, to victim blame the public into turning on eachother so they can continue to destroy the environment unchecked. Based on these comments, they’re succeeding.

    I’m not saying to not be mad. Be mad, get angry. Just be mad at the right people here. I’m not evil because I drive my 1.5L 4cyl sedan to the grocery once a week, and have a natural gas water heater. Sure, I should change that, and I’m sure I will be changing that when I can, but I’m not the problem. The greenhouse gasses I emit over my lifetime won’t offset the emissions of transport ships in a single year.

    Just… Be mad at the right people. Stop making people feel bad for being given bad options because the automotive industry actively and knowingly rejected electric vehicles due to how deep they were with the oil industry. So people had to buy internal combustion vehicles because there literally was no other option at the time. I’ve had my car since 2014. In 2014, the model S (the only model at the time), was $70k USD to start. I didn’t have $70k USD to spend on a car (I still don’t). I spent less than one-quarter of that price on my vehicle, and I was barely able to afford it over a 5 year finance. Yet, based on these comments, I should be ashamed that I can’t afford a BEV? Or that I live too far from everything that I can’t ride a bike or something?

    Come on people. You know who is really at fault here. Let’s just be angry at the right people.

  • secretlyaddictedtolinux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    climate scientists have already lit themselves on fire trying to warn people and it didn’t actually do anything

    people are too religious to believe in science

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      People are setting themselves on fire, throwing food at famous art or stopping traffic because it feels like a bad dream where you see the disaster coming and you’re trying to shake people to get them to understand that we have to DO something, and they just stare straight ahead like zombies.

      These are people who are scared and frustrated because we’ve tried EVERYTHING and nobody actually cares. When I tried to impart this message on reddit, people were like “I get it but why can’t they just promote recycling or protest peacefully?” and then a 50-comment deep thread about whether or not the liquid soup can work its way through the screws on the plating that covers the artwork and what kind of lasting damage it might do.

      Meanwhile, our destruction is literally around the corner. I don’t get it.

      We deserve what’s coming.

    • Moneo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      For a start you could get active in local politics and support zoning reform. Car dependent infrastructure is a huge contributor to greenhouse gas emissions and I am not just talking about car exhaust.

      If we want to solve climate change we need to change our way of life, and that means ditching as many cars as possible.

      • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I don’t disagree with you, having walkable infrastructure would be great.

        It just doesn’t really seem achievable in any meaningful way.

        A few hundred km from here a gargantuan hydrogen facility is being built - using solar to cracking hydrogen from sea water. It will take decades to build, and is a big undertaking.

        I offer the above as an example of something difficult but reasonably achievable.

        Lobbying local government to favour walkable infrastructure just doesn’t seem like a viable pathway to meaningful change in a reasonable time horizon.

        Yes I should take 15 minutes every election cycle to vote for the right person. Beyond that though my input wouldn’t be very valuable.

        • Moneo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 months ago

          The Netherlands went from car dependent nightmare to cycle capital of the world in a generation. Meaningful change takes time but it is possible in our life times and it isn’t going to happen on it’s own.

          Voting is good, talk to your friends. Be that annoying person who won’t shut the fuck up about how annoying cars are, change peoples minds or at least plant the idea in their brain that we can exist without cars.

          Apathy solves nothing.

          • The Menemen!@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            The netherlands still have a terrible CO2 bilance, which shows that we have to think much bigger than that.

            On the local space have a focus on the climate impact preperation. This might very well safe many lifes in your city/town/village. For the climate change reduction think national and international.

      • secretlyaddictedtolinux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        what? it’s too late for that.

        we are all actually going to die. changing a zoning rule? you think that’s going to help?

        if there’s an avalanche that is seconds away from enveloping you in snow and killing you, do you suggest walking a few steps to the side? it won’t do anything. the math is too much at this point to change with recycling a can or planting a tree. the only thing that will get the world to finally believe in math is massive amounts of death

        make peace with death, it’s coming for us all

      • recapitated@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’m pretty sure the only way to solve this is by an extension of politics though another means. Are you ready?

        • Moneo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’m not sure I’m ready no, but this is a problem that can and has been solved through less dramatic means.

          • recapitated@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            I would like to hear some encouraging examples for the has part of “can and has”. (Bearing in mind the chart from this post)

            It seems to me that market forces are in charge of us, and I don’t believe we’re going to escape the death spiral we’re in. I would of course love to be wrong.

      • nadram@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 months ago

        TBH this is the answer. If govs are willing to sell themselves and all legislature to the highest bidder, then it’s time for mass protests, strikes, and molotovs.

        • secretlyaddictedtolinux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          that could have changed the trajectory 50 years ago

          if people had been scientifically literate and recognized the problem

          it’s too late now

          this will happen when the pain of reality (regular temperatures in the 100s) overcomes the stupidity of religion, but there won’t be any going back

  • pedz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    I know. I’m in my early 40ies and have been trying all my life to convince people around me and do what I could. But with time, I learned about the fraud that is plastic recycling and how capitalism is really not interested at all into solving the issue. My city is fining people for putting recyclables in the trash, but the recycling centres are full and they themselves trash the recycling. What matters is short term profits and virtue signalling. What matters is to look green. Just buy electric cars and everything will be good, apparently. Buy green! But don’t stop buying!

    Then a pandemic happened and people disappointed me en masse. We could see the changes in the environment and in ways we could live, but most people were “EaGeR To GeT BaCk To ThEiR RoUtInE”, even if it meant commuting 5 days a week to the office, just to “resume” the economy. What mattered was not other people, it was the economy. Even when they forced us to stay inside with curfews, people couldn’t go out to run/walk in the evening, they barred unvaccinated people from stores (I’m vaccinated 4 times but it’s still not okay), it was all for the economy and to save the system, not the people. And if you had a minor disagreement with this, you were a grandma killer for wanting to go cycling at night. Then we went back to our routines and nothing will ever change. People are whining because of paper straws and want the plastic back. And all this straw stupidity is not even important on the grand scheme of things. Most people don’t want to change anything. Most people will not vote for change. The system does not have any incentive to change.

    I never owned a car and everyone around me is telling me how great they are and how I should definitely buy one because it’s useful and practical. I would have total absolution! Some people here are vociferously fighting against active and public transit, and the government is actually cutting public transit funding. People are yelling at me when I trash some plastic instead of putting it in the recycle bin, then they drive away in their car that generates literal tons of toxic fumes and greenhouse gases in the air, accusing me of not caring.

    I gave up a few years ago. We will deserve most of it.

    Don’t worry, the rich will eat well and survive, with their private security forces willing to kill others, while the poor will starve and die. We’ll have rations and curfews but it will all be for the good of the people economy. Just like in the pandemic, It will be an effort of the poor, to save the rich. That’s what we want. You just have to become rich before it happens.

    • nehal3m@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Seconded. It’s so baffling to me that we have seemingly forgotten the purpose of the economy. It is supposed to be there to benefit our lives and instead it is costing us everything. Some slave away on their knees building streets and others waste the precious few laps around the sun staring at lights in a box. We have the technology to give everyone enough such that the average person would only have to work a few hours.

      For a comparison in a very real sense:

      Prior to the Neolithic revolution, which put an end to our nomadic past and turned our species into agriculturalists, it took more than 50 hours of labor (mostly gathering wood) to “buy” 1,000 lumen hours of light. By 1800, it took about 5.4 hours. By 1900, it took 0.22 hours. By 1992, 1,000 lumen hours required 0.00012 hours of human labor.

      We’ve put the cart before the horse on an unfathomable scale. A good life for all (current humans and future) is within reach but the economic system that has created this bounty has grown out of control and serves nothing but itself anymore.

      • Skeezix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Skeezix’s Law: The purpose of the economy is to extract as much value from the populace as possible, but whatever means possible, in any way that offers an alibi.

        In your grandfather’s day, choice, privacy, and leisure were humored by the economy. As the decades have passed, the economy has advanced to become a machine increasingly fine-tuned to extract value. As the world burns and resources run out, the economy attempts to adapt by strengthening its extraction methods further.

        The average human sees 2000-5000 ads per day in one form or another.

      • Match!!@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        It does provide some promise though because if we want to live good, peaceful, sustainable, educated lives, the technology is right there, but there is an external and only barely human force that is imposing a malignant culture on us all.

    • Kanzar@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      The bit about not being able to go outside is because people were using it as a pretext to explain why they weren’t at home… when really they were off socialising and increasing possible infection points.

      It’s why they closed children’s playgrounds here in Australia, parents were using their children playing to gather around, then held empty coffee cups to explain why their masks were off. I’ve never seen so many people desperately swigging at water bottles in a supermarket in my life, or young men clutching at low dose asthma inhalers either. Somewhat amusingly, none of these behaviours have shown up since.

      If people could have shown any level of responsibility… but there we have it, don’t we? They can’t see beyond the end of their own nose, and this is why we are here, finding out.

      • Skeezix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        When I arrived on earth the first thing that struck me was just how fickle, shortsighted, gullible, and inconsiderate the bulk of your species is. As this planet burns your noses are stuck in phones watching YouTube shorts.

        We’ve decided to leave. You’re not worth conquering and certainly not worthy of joining the stellar empire. Expect no more crop circles or foo fighters.

        Your people is a beast.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      The rich will live long enough to preside over a dead planet. Having billions of dollars to buy an apple is useless when there are no apples to be had for any price. They’ll die like the rest of us, just way more alone. Assuming they aren’t burned out if their bunkers along the way by starving hordes with nothing to lose.

      • Azzu@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s not quite true. It’s very unlikely the planet will become completely inhabitable to humans anytime soon. There’s going to be a tipping point of enough extinction to completely stop any more damage and return to a balanced ecosystem. Once that happens, it’s very likely the people with the most power will be the ones in the remaining habitable zones.

        • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I think your assumption operates on the premise that some form of recognizable modern civilization will remain. I don’t think it will. Once mass deaths start for humans it will also cease the global flow of petroleum products, materials, and foods, either due to wars or just the structure being so damaged that it cannot function. Once you can’t get fuel, can’t mine things, can’t refine them, can’t transport them, can’t fix the machines that make fertilizers or tractor parts, can’t keep the computers running, the internet collapses…that’s it. Hell, that’s the good scenario, not the one where the ocean overheats /-acidifies , killing everything in it including much of the planets oxygen generating algae. Civilization is done. Almost all surface minerals are gone because we’ve already mined them, well, except coal…but that’s what helped get us here in the first place. We are literally back to a Stone Age or scavenging materials from the bones of civilization.

          Mad Max or some similar post-apocalyptic desolation is a far more likely scenario than any situation where a holdout of modern civilization exists.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      5 months ago

      I have a coworker who hates undocumented immigrants because she thinks they’re all unvaccinated and spreaders of disease. This would be an unremarkable bit of stupidity except that she’s also anti-vax.

    • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 months ago

      Fringe fascists in Europe have already been co-opting the green message for the last 10 years.

      Because that’s what fascism does: take a popular idea and worm it’s way inside.

    • Avialle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      Nah, there are 2 ways of thinking about this topic, which the right wing idiots in Germany use (at the same time): 1. there’s no climate change, because look: cold weather right now and 2. This change occurs naturally, nothing to do with us but planets and stuff.

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t think even they believe that. They’re just scared and don’t want to share their long plundered wealth

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      June already bringing on intense heat waves in California and Mexico are probably driving the doomerism on the west coast.

      Houston also got a nasty Derecho a few weeks back that wrecked downtown and shredded half the trees in my neighborhood.

      I expect the next big hurricane is going to bring another wave of doomerism, as we all get another big dose of “Find Out”, while our Boomer elders continue to Fuck Around

      • RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Every single thing we are fighting for and does get through has prevented stuff from being even worse than they are now. Don’t ever give up.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          What gets through? I simply don’t see it. Fossil fuel drilling in the US has hit an all-time high. Domestic car sizes are only getting bigger and we’re taxing or banning any small, cheap foreign EV imports. For every pipeline that gets stalled, three more are built. We don’t even bother reporting on spills anymore, despite their increasing frequency. We are epically fucked and we all know it.

          Don’t ever give up.

          Give up doing what? This isn’t Peter Pan. You can’t bring us under 1.5C by clapping.

          • RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yeah 1.5 is fucked. But we can still limit it under 2.0 or 2.5. Yes it is fucking horrific. But 1.5 does not mean everyone suddenly drops dead.

            Also, the world isnt the US. Improvements are happening on a smaller scale. Some countries getting almost all energy through solar and wind.

            Green energy becoming cheaper than fossil fuel.

            Is it enough? Fuck no. But im not letting you cunts hop in with corporations and push the pedal to the metal.

            Stop ignoring all the positive things happening to fix the climate. You are putting other people off helping with your doomer shit.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              5 months ago

              But we can still limit it under 2.0 or 2.5.

              Unless I’m talking to a CEO of a major bank or Fortune 100 fossil fuel firm, “we” cannot.

              • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                You talk to politicians. Politicians talk to (or coerce) CEOs.

                We can’t trust companies to get us out of this, but government is (or should be) stronger than companies, and government is (or should be) working for US.

                • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  And CEOs pledge campaign contributions and lobbying efforts to delay regulations against their corporate interests

                  Government should be the counter balance to private interests, but in a capitalistic system they act in tandem.

          • RBWells@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            You don’t think it could have been even worse by now? I do.

            Will say though, I do wish to visit the timeline where Al Gore did not concede, and was president.

        • Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yeah, but if it’s inevitable going to end up at worse… Now I have to deal with this shit AND take care of the fuckin boomers… Shoulda just let them tear the bandaid off quick and have to deal with it themselves… ~devil’s advocate

  • mad_asshatter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    I read an article on the internet that says you’re wrong, and it’s chemtrails and 5G. And Big Pharma.

    And solar. And wind mills. And what they did to General Lee. And Aunt Jemima.

    Do your research, sheeple!

  • ammonium@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    While I get the sentiment and believe action is necessary, this is the wrong way to approach it. Panic is not the way we will solve this crisis.

    There’s a way out, and if we get through we’ll be in a better place than we’ve ever been. We need to mass invest in green technology. Solar, wind, nuclear, throw everything at it and see what sticks. Solar is already on the right track to save us, but it’s better if it goes even faster and have a few back up plans.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Panic is not the way we will solve this crisis.

      In this case panic is preferable to completely ignoring the problem as is currently humanity’s strategy.

        • secretlyaddictedtolinux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          if a group of people are in a burning building and about to die, panic would actually help them get out

          in this case, however, it’s unlikely anyone is going to get out of this building, and it’s too late to change things, so perhaps you are right

          we should just find ways to make peace with the destruction of much of life on earth

          • ammonium@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Excellent example of what I mean. In a burning building panic isn’t helpful and hinders the actual correct response, just like with climate change.

            • secretlyaddictedtolinux@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              that’s not true. in a burning building, freaking out and getting the fuck out of the building is smart and why it’s instinctual

              sitting around and debating the best way to proceed is stupid AF

              • ammonium@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                that’s not true. in a burning building, freaking out and getting the fuck out of the building is smart and why it’s instinctual

                Not at all, why do you think during fire drills you’re instructed to stay calm?

                • secretlyaddictedtolinux@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  They say that when there are large number of people and a risk of people being trampled or when there are young students and teachers need to keep count to make sure everyone gets out.

                  At this point, the risk of every person on earth dying due to inaction or calmly discussing small ways to change is much higher than if everyone panics. People should have panicked 50 years ago when they looked at data.

                  But go ahead, have calm rational discussions about policy decisions that can reduce exponential growth of destructive forces by 30 percent. Because nothing stops exponential growth like mild decreases in the rate of change.

    • zazo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Is it on its way to save us though? Sure the global north might be able to escape the worst and maintain some semblance of normality but how does that work for the remaining 90% of the world? Those that can neither afford nor have the time to wait until the “green energy revolution” reaches them? Do we just accept they’ll never be able to reap the benefits of their own exploitation?

      I know you don’t have the answers but these are questions we nees to grapple with that nobody seems to know how to answer…

      • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        A lot of places in the global south are already using solar and wind because it’s cheaper than trying to get on the oil competition, cheap Chinese solar is increasing this. What would really help is western governments investing in designing open source solutions that make staying off oil easier but apparently the only thing that matters to us is short term profits

      • ammonium@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        No we don’t need to accept that, they can be better off by the end of this century than we are now.

        • secretlyaddictedtolinux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          small gestures that make us feel good will not have a meaningful impact on the exponential changes in the chemical composition of the atmosphere that will result in the destruction of the biosphere and are counter-productive because they create an illusion of safety and control, like like putting your seat belt on just before you slam into a wall while speeding at 300 mph.

          better?

    • OsrsNeedsF2P
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yea, the graph showing us up 4 standard deviations isn’t easy to understand implications. But I imagine on a person level, it’s something like “if you live somewhere hot and humid, you better make sure you can afford to run and repair your AC”. On a global level, mammals have existed for 200,000,000 years, yet in 200 years we’ve toyed with global extinction for shareholder profits.

      • conquer4@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        Meh, humans will survive, literally, unless Antarctica heats over 200 degrees from now, we can survive somewhere on the planet. We won’t prosper, there will be billions of deaths and an unimaginable about of loss, but short of planned deliberate nuclear war or large asteroid, we’ll survive a little.