Beetle_O_Rourke [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 5 months agoAny Dermatologist not in bed with Big Soap will agree!!hexbear.netimagemessage-square46fedilinkarrow-up178arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up178arrow-down1imageAny Dermatologist not in bed with Big Soap will agree!!hexbear.netBeetle_O_Rourke [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square46fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarekristina [she/her]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up39·5 months agoThe Vikings tried really hard to get the British to take a bath.
minus-squarepooh [she/her, love/loves]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·5 months agoI think the Romans also attempted this with the British, from what I’ve read.
minus-squaresir_this_is_a_wendys@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·edit-24 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squareTankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·5 months agoAnd neither Romans nor Vikings are around anymore. Coincidence? I think not!
minus-squarepooh [she/her, love/loves]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·5 months agoWell, I mean, the modern English are sort of descended from Vikings (Anglo-Saxons). Scots and Irish are still mostly Celtic though (I think) and those places are way cooler, so not sure this argument holds
minus-squarepseudo@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·5 months agoNot an expert but from the name, I would imagine they descend from the Angles (Engles?) and the Saxes not from the Vikings.
minus-squarepooh [she/her, love/loves]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·5 months agoYeah, for some reason I was thinking Angles and Saxons were considered Vikings but I was totally wrong on that. You are correct.
minus-squareProfessorOwl_PhD [any]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 months agoNortheast England and the east coast of Scotland have a fair amount of viking ancestry about from all the raiding, so it’s not completely baseless.
minus-squareTankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·5 months agoDescended from is not the same as being. An Italian American is not an Italian is not a Roman even if you can trace descent.
minus-squarehighalectical@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-25 months agodeleted by creator
The Vikings tried really hard to get the British to take a bath.
I think the Romans also attempted this with the British, from what I’ve read.
deleted by creator
And neither Romans nor Vikings are around anymore. Coincidence? I think not!
Well, I mean, the modern English are sort of descended from Vikings (Anglo-Saxons). Scots and Irish are still mostly Celtic though (I think) and those places are way cooler, so not sure this argument holds
Not an expert but from the name, I would imagine they descend from the Angles (Engles?) and the Saxes not from the Vikings.
Yeah, for some reason I was thinking Angles and Saxons were considered Vikings but I was totally wrong on that. You are correct.
Northeast England and the east coast of Scotland have a fair amount of viking ancestry about from all the raiding, so it’s not completely baseless.
Descended from is not the same as being. An Italian American is not an Italian is not a Roman even if you can trace descent.
deleted by creator