• Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah there was an agreement in Paris in 2015, and the one of the first things Trump did when elected to office was to back out of that deal. Never trust an (unsuccessful) business man to choose what is best for people, they only care about making more money for themselves and to hell with all the people that die or get hurt along the way.

    • NaN@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We rejoined in 2021.

      The doomer view is that even that agreement was too little too late. We should’ve been doing this stuff in the 80s.

      • FoxBJK@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        At this point can we really call it a “doomer view” or just reality? We’re several decades late on dealing with this problem and it’s entirely possible we’re gonna miss the boat completely.

        Or tell me I’m wrong and show me there’s still hope.

        • user9294
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s still hope.

          The truth is, most conservation act are built on thebidea that if we just stop damaging earth, it’ll go back to normal.

          That would be ideal, but we might have missed that boat.

          But, there are also all sorts of industrial carbon sequestration methods we aren’t taking into account.

          When we get serious about fixing the environment, we’ll build machines that suck pollution out of the sky and sea.

          We’re possibly too late for a passive effort, but we have the option of an active effort to use geo-engineering to fix this.

        • NaN@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’d love to tell you that, but I found Deep Adaptation compelling. I don’t think we get out of it without technologies that do not exist, developed with funding that is not prioritized.

          Somehow I still manage to be disappointed with the state of things often which means I must have some slight hope that things will stop I guess.

      • Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Considering major oil companies like Exxon buried their own studies in the 70’s showing that this was going to happen, there was a lot we could have done back when small changes would have been easy. Now we’re fucked – it’s going to hurt everyone to make the changes needed, and the effects of climate change that we can’t stop are going to hurt even more – but hey it’s ok because the big corporations made their money and too bad for the rest of us. We’re not on the brink of extinction yet, but I’m betting life in another 50-100 years is going to be unrecognizable to what we were used to in the 80’s.

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It had no teeth. Unsurprisingly many countries are failing to meet their targets.