• YouKnowWhoTheFuckIAM@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s true though. They’re not nazis. They’re incapable of being fired by any fundamentally political or spiritual ideals, no matter how ultimately black and nihilistic, at all. Even if these people were full-throated card-carrying members of the American Nazi party marching through Times Square with a swastika flag throwing out copies of Der Sturmer from a Panzer tank they wouldn’t be nazis. The fact is that they’re just the purest distillation of 20th-21st century media culture yet: they’re so utterly saturated in media that the only choice they’ve made, the only choice available to them, was whether to lean into the goodie or the baddie vibe, and they plumped for “baddie” because it suited their contrarian aesthetic and then, without even leaving a ripple on the surface, they slipped into the role and inhabited it so thoroughly that it is, literally, indistinguishable from who they are.

    These people are nothing less, and 100% nothing more, than your childish glee at getting to play the villain in an RPG.

    • sc_griffith@awful.systemsOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      78
      ·
      7 months ago

      Historians have a word for Germans who joined the Nazi party, not because they hated Jews, but out of a hope for restored patriotism, or a sense of economic anxiety, or a hope to preserve their religious values, or dislike of their opponents, or raw political opportunism, or convenience, or ignorance, or greed. That word is “Nazi.”

      • YouKnowWhoTheFuckIAM@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I’m saying this goes further!

        Actually I feel kind of irked that this reply seems to just miss the part at the end of the paragraph that says “it is, literally, indistinguishable from who they are”

        • sc_griffith@awful.systemsOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          7 months ago

          I didn’t miss it. I just don’t see any need to be elaborate about the word nazi, although I do appreciate what a crushingly insulting description of them you gave

          • YouKnowWhoTheFuckIAM@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Scholars of fascism and nazism do it all the time! The target of quotes like that is supposed to be those who deliberately muddy the waters. The “call a nazi a nazi” principle is a blunt instrument, and there are other tools in the anti-nazi kit.

            [some hours later…] ah, the quote is from AR Moxon, whom I happen to know is both (a) not remotely averse to going deeper on what makes the nazis, (b) distinctly averse to not going deeper

          • corbin@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            Paraphrasing Santayana, we must understand why people become fascist, or else we will not understand how to prevent ourselves from making the same mistakes of dehumanization and black-and-white reasoning which characterize their piss-poor attempts at logic.

    • V0ldek@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      These people are nothing less, and 100% nothing more, than your childish glee at getting to play the villain in an RPG.

      I’m pretty certain I get more glee from my RP than they ever experienced in their lives.

    • self@awful.systemsM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      7 months ago

      ok so this is driving me crazy

      am I weird for thinking the circle of candles in the fireplace (in a house that’s allegedly unbearably cold) is weird?

      • deborah@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s weird, but it’s normal weird. It’s the kind of thing you see in design magazines and pinterest and the spruce. I don’t know if actual rich people do it but it’s definitely fairly normal middlebrow home decor.

        (A lot of fireplaces in older US buildings are vestigial, often blocked up, and are inefficient at heating.)

        • froztbyte@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          it’s also definitely the sort of shit you see in some midmarket airbnb’s (because it’s in design/pinterest/etc magazines)

        • deborah@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          7 months ago

          The prose on that The Spruce link makes me hate the concepts of design, aesthetics, and houses.

    • maol@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      7 months ago

      Reaching through my screen into this photo so I can pull out the rifle and shoot myself

      Who thought it would be a good idea to keep that in a household with 3 kids under 5. Is it just so they can flash it at Republicans and win primary votes??

  • deborah@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    7 months ago

    three consecutive youtube thumbnails, dated 11, 9, and 4 years ago, showing simone’s transition from having fun with a channel woman in a cute fascinator to hugo boss chic

    Gee, I wonder what about the time period from 2015 to 2020 would have prompted the transformation from “occasional youtuber who goofily wears fascinators and cute nerdy graphic tees” to “hugo boss chic”. Must have just been her own changing tastes, couldn’t possibly be related to anything else.

    • blakestacey@awful.systemsM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      The video title “A Pragmatist’s Take on Small Talk” would be much better if it were William James giving advice on navigating the social niceties. Step 1: this hat.

    • jonhendry@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      The middle picture looks very much like a young lesbian couple.

      Not that there’s anything wrong with lesbian couples of any age. It’s just with this pair it’s… odd.

      I can’t help it. I see a picture of them and it’s like a puzzle I need to solve.

      • o7___o7@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Where are the bed sheets?

        Also, where are the family photos? Framed art? Kid drawings?

        Edit: Cobra Commander and the Baroness at home in a GI-Joe movie directed by Michael Bay circa 2008.

        Edit2: Evil Sean Astin

        Edit3: I’ve never seen a three-piece suit with dungarees. It’s the mullet of suits: business on the top, party on the bottom.

        I’m sorry, I’m being awfully mean and petty on the internet today.

        • froztbyte@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          7 months ago

          the kids have to thunderdome it out for recognition, and then they have to pay for the photos with their own money that they earned in their weekend jobs (you know, the ones they get to do after their homejobs all week). just like in a perfectly normal family!

        • carlitoscohones@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Edit3: I’ve never seen a three-piece suit with dungarees. It’s the mullet of suits: business on the top, party on the bottom.

          I came here the other day to post this. Just bizarre.

  • Architeuthis@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    There’s an actual explanation in the original article about some of the wardrobe choices. It’s even dumber, and it involves effective altruism.

    It is a very cold home. It’s early March, and within 20 minutes of being here the tips of some of my fingers have turned white. This, they explain, is part of living their values: as effective altruists, they give everything they can spare to charity (their charities). “Any pointless indulgence, like heating the house in the winter, we try to avoid if we can find other solutions,” says Malcolm. This explains Simone’s clothing: her normal winterwear is cheap, high-quality snowsuits she buys online from Russia, but she can’t fit into them now, so she’s currently dressing in the clothes pregnant women wore in a time before central heating: a drawstring-necked chemise on top of warm underlayers, a thick black apron, and a modified corset she found on Etsy. She assures me she is not a tradwife. “I’m not dressing trad now because we’re into trad, because before I was dressing like a Russian Bond villain. We do what’s practical.”

    • deborah@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yes and that’s obviously lies, as anyone who has grown up with limited income in a cold area can tell them. Cheap, warm clothing is not bought online (in the US) from Russia, and never from Etsy. In the US it’s bought — if you’re buying new at all! — from Target or Kohl’s or some other big chain. You get layers, you get things used when you can, and the cheapest way to dress warmly is the most normie, uninteresting clothes that are mass produced and sold in low end department stores.

      Nothing they describe is practical or cheap. It’s cosplay Kinder, Küche, Kirche, and the journalist repeated it verbatim because she’s a chump.

    • MBM@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      7 months ago

      Warm clothes instead of heating is great, but they manage to subvert it in a very EA way. The way they talk about it sounds almost Calvinist. I wonder if they have some equivalent of the secret TV in the attic.

      • deborah@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        There’s no reason to believe they live this way in reality. None of these profiles do any actual journalism. None of them investigate whether their claims about their childhood are true. This one doesn’t even talk to the neighbors who theoretically live next door for free (and do the unpaid childcare). This is stenography of neo-fash influencers self-described life and there’s no reason to believe any of it.

  • David Gerard@awful.systemsM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    7 months ago

    from bsky

    unfortunately had to slap my youngest child, hyperion dipshit, in the target parking lot today after he failed to show proper respect to a cybertruck. before you call that abuse, just ask my other children, aryan chlamydia and maximus trifecta what they think

    confiscating Adeptus Mechanus’s iPad to teach him a lesson about makers and takers

    cursed subskeet is what we plan to name our fourth child

  • IHeartBadCode@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    7 months ago

    The biggest issue with these people is they use “reason and logic” to arrive at their belief, but literally fail to connect dots because of their removal from reality.

    the problem is most acute in countries that are “technophilic, pluralistic, educated, where women have rights”.

    It’s not because women have rights though. It’s because rich fucks like his mentor Musk absorbs the majority of prosperity in nations. If there’s no hope, there’s no reason to continue.

    The only places where the birthrate is not falling to unsustainable levels are countries where the average citizen earns less than $5,000 (£4,000) a year

    And this isn’t even true. Places like India, even the poorest of the poor regions, are seeing their population boom quickly decline. So while technically they haven’t hit negative values, they’re already moving in that direction.

    Whenever you hit max value for a resource, you’ve hit peak that resource, and humanity has hit peak humanity in terms of how the various governments and economic systems view value in their fellow mankind. Economic systems have no additional value to give (or value that they WANT to give) to human beings. There’s just no additional investment going into that resource. We’ve hit peak humanity in an economic sense, so there’s just zero reason for something to grow if nothing is being invested into it.

    This would be clear to this couple if their heads weren’t so far up their asses.

    • maol@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      7 months ago

      Not a mention in the article of the impact of pollution on fertility, which isn’t inconsiderable.

      Two factors that have made the birth rate go down are a) greater access to contraception and abortion for women and b) reduced numbers of teenage pregnancies. Of course forced births and forced labour are a-ok with these two.