• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    6 months ago

    I recall reading how the MIC is basically the main industry and source of employment in a lot of states.

    • Dr_Gabriel_Aby [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      6 months ago

      While it would make military sense for a state like West Virginia or Arizona (next to very expensive but vital states, lots of space, far enough from coastal attack) to be the main base for any of these companies, the logistics planning of these companies are meticulously stretched out so that essentially every congressperson is at risk of losing votes if they vote for any sort of cuts to the MIC.

      This is part of why things are so expensive. Northrop Grumman engineers on Long Island have to travel to Fairfax VA for meetings, and then go to Palmdale CA to see what they are building in person.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        6 months ago

        I imagine the main reason things are expensive is that producing cheap weapons isn’t a goal. The primary motivator is to divert as much tax money as possible into the hands of people who own the war industry. This results in making expensive weapons that require a lot of maintenance, because that’s how you maximize profits.