• Beaver @lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    232
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    Big Tech needs to knows its place. Yes especially you Apple. Make sideloading available globally.

  • _sideffect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    194
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Big tech can go F itself.

    All big tech has done is stolen our data and lied to us for their own needs.

    Make all software FOSS

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      38
      ·
      1 month ago

      This smells like sour grapes to me, just like when people say to boycott Starbucks and then in the same breath say their coffee sucks. These companies became behemoths because people find a lot of value in the products and services they offer. Failing to acknowledge that truth just makes you sound out of touch.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I mean you SHOULD boycott starbucks for their business practices. But you can’t say their coffee sucks. They don’t have coffee. They have “diabetic inducing coffee flavored sugarwater”

        But it’s not coffee

      • golli@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        people find a lot of value in the products and services they offer

        This is definitely true to some degree, but there imo is also another side to this.

        Yes, they there are underlying problems/demands that they solve, but they definitely also create and shape those since psychology sadly works extremely effective. And they really try their hardest to manipulate customers.

        Another aspect is that they might have originally created that value and given the users what they wanted, which got them in the position they are in now. Sometimes even operating at a loss to bully competition out of the market. But once they achieved this dominant position enshittification commences. Which wouldn’t be that much of an issue, if they wouldn’t also often prevent competition from growing enough to be able to compete.

        Example Google search: The demand for a way to navigate the web is real and google fulfilled it best, which made them huge. Timejump to the present: the demand is still the same, but now google shows you what they want you to see and pay billions to be the default search engine to hinder any competition from gaining any traction.

      • suction@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s a timeline. tech companies have become much worse, and people warning about them more vocal, so the lower educated classes who mindlessly use their products have (partially) woken up to the real motives of companies who create “free to use” products, i.e. data mining. In the EU, we have a lot of dummies who we call “remote controlled”, who want to simulate a version of the US lifestyle (huge cars, celebrity adulation, eating like shit, single-issue voting, vapidness). These mainly teenagers but regrettably also low-class adults. Those are also the people who still use social networks because they have nothing else going on and are too lazy to invest their free time in worthwhile activities. So it’s a class issue, the social underbelly of the EU is remote controlled by US culture and corporations almost like the social underbelly of the US is.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Americans found lots of values in Starbucks coffee because Americans have no concept of coffee that’s simultaneously black, not bitter, not acidic, and sweet. It would be wrong to blame Starbucks for that, they’re a symptom, not the cause, but yes their coffee sucks. As it does everywhere else in the US, the country that thought that percolators were a mighty fine idea.

        (And yes I know you guys invented the Aeropress. Good thing, good job, good coffee (with proper beans), now also use it).

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Starbucks can provide value to Americans and their coffee can suck, those two things are not mutually exclusive.

  • Brickardo@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    174
    ·
    1 month ago

    Please, remember to vote on the European elections! We do need the EU to keep taking actions like this

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      As an American, please vote. Our country is owned by the corporations, at least yours can bring them to heel sometimes.

    • Sadbutdru@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      :`-( I miss voting in the European elections! 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇪🇺💪

    • Emmie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      European elections have this advantage that the morons don’t even go to vote nor know what is going on.
      It’s the sole reason why is it going so good, obfuscation. Anything outside of the country is too much too grasp for the rightists.

      There’s some kind of deep moral to this and I am not sure it is a good one

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I don’t think that’s true at all.

        When the UK was in the EU, UKIP was their largest party. For France, Le Pen’s National Front party was the largest. And they aren’t alone. There’s a number of right wing EU parties.

        And it’s due to get worse, if we bring data into it. Many countries in the EU are swinging to the right. Polling is indicating right wing parties will have a solid majority in the EU parliament this year.

        • Emmie@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Well it’s true where I live. Those elections are seen as unimportant and not many care and even skip them with a tendency for more… intellectually, EU versed ppl to vote

          25% attendance in eu elections vs 45% for country parliament. Most recent elections improved 40 to 65

          As I said the moral of this story isn’t pretty

        • Miaou@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          I think those politicians don’t really bother going to the parliament and mostly cash the checks in, but it’s just a guess

  • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    131
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    There’s a rule banning “self-preferencing.” That’s when platforms push their often inferior, in-house products and hide superior products made by their rivals.

    Spaz isn’t going to like this.

    • stephan@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      He wouldn’t if it applied to him. Unfortunately, reddit is not a gatekeeper in the sense of the DMA and due to its management it’s also unlikely to ever reach that position :)

      • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        You’re right. Hopefully they will expand the rules to include non-gatekeeper services like Reddit once the rule is in effect.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      Unless the saga continues, they didn’t “hide” the competition, they paywalled their access.

      There’s nothing wrong, per se, with charging access to the API. Where they went wrong was setting an exorbitant price. That was clearly anti-competitive. They knew the pricing they set wouldn’t be sustainable to any third party developers. Then he started shit talking the Apollo developer…

      • purplemonkeymad@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Well it may or may not be wrong. One of the measures would be, can Reddit afford the price if it also had pay for the same access? If the answer is no, then it might be considered preferential treatment to their own app. However ianal so there could be a carve out for that.

  • macniel@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    122
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    To this articles question on why apple should care about EUs 500 million citizens when they have trillions of Dollars. Well given that the USA only has 333 millions I would say they should care a lot.

    • RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      1 month ago

      As of the second quarter of fiscal year 2024, the Americas held around 41 percent of the revenue, whereas Europe came in second with roughly over 26.5 percent.

      source

      As the second largest revenue generator, Europe has a powerful voice.

      • kirklennon@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        The EU is only one chunk of Apple’s “Europe” segment, which is defined as “European countries, as well as India, the Middle East and Africa.”

        • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Most companies group MENA separately. They must sell so few devices there that they don’t want to show the numbers separately

          • kirklennon@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            They’ve used the same segments for a long time and presumably maintain them for consistency, so I think it really just tells us that they used to sell very little there. India, in particular, has been a large growth market for Apple in the past couple of years, but is still just thrown in with “Europe.”

            • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              I can’t speak for Apple, but every company I’ve worked for has split their region reporting as soon as one of the traditionally smaller regions gets big enough

              It creates hype and a boost to their stock price

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          And I think a lot of that revenue is in the Middle East to be honest. Those are poorer parts of the world, but with very bad culture of demonstrative consumption.

          Still, how big this is for Apple is important only for Apple users. While creating a culture of not fucking around is important for everyone.

          So I’d say the EU should cut Apple down right now. They’ve made a lot of bad faith and faux compliance actions. Just ban them. I’m confident there’s much more than one reason justifying that legally. No, that company doesn’t help innovation, education and whatever else.

    • IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      Apple needs to realize that the EU doesn’t care if they left. They barely pay any taxes in the EU and don’t even create much economic value. Since most Apple jobs in the EU are in retail, businesses administration and tax evasion. They don’t produce shit here.

      • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 month ago

        Meta tried to do the same. The EU response was to ask when they’d leave to plan the going away party. Meta was a lot less confrontational after that.

        • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 month ago

          I think that the EU is fully aware that what makes those extra powerful is network effect. And, once they’re gone, something else pops up in their place. The case of Germans using WhatsApp for example would become inconvenient for them for fifteen whole minutes, then they’d jump into an alternative, and business as usual, without Faecesbook/Merda meddling.

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      The article is ok (summary of the current state of things) but the title is completely out of place.

  • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Apple’s going to fight all of this tooth and nail, country by country, to the end of time. Anything less and they risk a shareholder lawsuit.

    This is billions and billions of dollars we’re talking about, not chump change.

    • lorkano@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Apple get get out of my face. In EU, it’s not even close as popular as in NA. I wouldn’t care if they stopped selling products here

      • raldone01@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        While I don’t like Apple losing them in the EU would be bad. Forcing them to open up their garden is way better.

        Less competition is bad for the consumer (usually). If they break laws though they must not sell in the EU.

      • whome@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I know but it feels like it’s getting more popular especially with younger people the teenagers and young teens that I know tend to be overwhelming drawn towards apple

  • zweieuro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    In general the article seems to be a summary of current legislative actions that are ongoing between big tech and EU. Though in the article it’s worded with the much more fitting ‘game of chicken between EU and Big Tech’ rather than something like the title, but I guess “drop dead has a better ring to it”…

    I general the article has a lightly optimistic tone, which I very deeply hope holds true.

  • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    I feel like trying to make the big fish act in our interest and not theirs is fighting windmills.

    Better kill the big fish.

    Not directly on topic - note how all the socialist revolutionaries always start with killing the smallest fish and hate it the most. The big ones they try to convert.

    • mark@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Genuine question: how do we actually “kill the big fish” though? Majority are going to continue to use big tech out of convenience and because they dont care much.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        No quick way. There are too many regulations which are enforced badly and abused to actually support that “big fish”. Make them fewer and make the punishment swift and unavoidable and hard. And split a few of the worst offenders into parts each in one specific area - Apple, Google, Microsoft, Meta are all good candidates.

      • very_well_lost@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think in the end it all comes down to putting power back into the hands of regulators — power that corporate America has been slowly and steadily eroding for the last 40 years.

        A more powerful regulatory state could start enforcing the anti-trust laws we already have on the books by breaking up the massive tech monopolies. Once that’s done, new regulations and new legislation against anti-consumer practices are needed, but those will only work if the punishments scale high enough to work as an actual deterrent against the multi-billion dollar tech giants.

        Of course, we’d also need massive, MASSIVE campaign finance and lobbying reforms so that monied interested aren’t able to sabotage the system all over again.

        Or we could just bring back the guillotine… that would probably do the trick too.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          You forgot to say that regulatory apparatus should have much fewer points of failure. That is, it should be made stronger and more efficient, but it should be radically contracted. It’s bigger than needs be.

          By points of failure I mean opportunities for strong entities to make regulations work for monopolies\oligopolies.

      • asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        US is doing that with TikTok already. The government can snap their fingers and ban / break up companies at the drop of a hat if they want.

  • Patrick@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    On meta’s while it is flagrant screw you, they may have a valid argument. Human beings don’t actually need any kind of social media to survive, ergo it is a convenience or luxury that could be charged for.

    I’m certainly not agreeing with them, but they may be banking on that style argument and their ungodly amount of money to fight it.

    • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yes. But we have all gotten pretty used to things on the Internet not costing money. If they start costing money, many people will either not want to or be able to use them.

      • kn98@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Right. But if things do start to cost money, should that be stopped by laws?

    • Patrick@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Where they lose totally though is the off service data harvesting that isn’t even remotely “implied okay”

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Really the regulation should be about requiring social media companies to interoperate similar to regulation on the phone companies. You should be able to switch to another social media platform without losing your ability to communicate with your friends on the old platform similar to how you can still call your friends after you change phone companies.

      Then is if the social media companies want to charge money people could change to another platform without losing their contacts.

      Basically the only reason I still have facebook is to talk to chat with people on there that I can’t contact through other means.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        You should be able to switch to another social media platform without losing your ability to communicate with your friends on the old platform similar to how you can still call your friends after you change phone companies.

        Boy have I got some news for you about something called “the fediverse…”

    • stephan@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      You absolutely can charge for social media, just not the way Facebook does. They’re not charging for the service, just for not spying on you, which is illegal under GDPR.

    • el_abuelo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      To some people in some places Facebook is actually necessary in order to have a social life or run a business.

      We all know Facebook would die if it charged for access, because it would lose its ubiquity that makes it necessary for some people.

      What would actually be good is if instead of charging for privacy, they charged for enhanced features - similar to how discord charges for Nitro (I am not defending discord, just using their payment model as an example)

      The problem with that payment model though is then you have to actually develop features people want to pay for. And we all know Facebook is creatively bankrupt.

  • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    The Internet is a perfect example of why we can’t have nice things, or rather, why anarchy could never work.

    That’s what the Internet used to be, and what it largely is. And it worked quite well, until people realized the Internet could be monetized beyond just being an extension of your brand.

    Now it’s quite obvious that regulation is necessary. People are idiots and they can’t be trusted with a dopamine-injection-button run by greedy corporations. That gives those companies really unprecedented power.

  • rekabis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    When the Parasite Class objects so vehemently to something that is impacting their obscene profits and sociopathic control, you know that something is being done correctly.

  • lightnegative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    There’s a rule banning “self-preferencing.” That’s when platforms push their often inferior, in-house products and hide superior products made by their rivals

    Wow, I can see Microsoft fighting this one tooth and nail. It’s basically their whole business model