• veee@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    148
    ·
    6 months ago

    as reported in Vietnam.net, it’s possible Steam has been taken down in Vietnam after local game developers complained about the scope and size of Steam’s vast portfolio of games, claiming Vietnamese devs cannot compete with Steam’s releases given they are subject to government approval and thousands of international games on Steam are not.

    Citing it as “an injustice to domestic publishers”, Vietnamese studios reportedly say that local game development “will die” if Steam is able to keep releasing games without the same government scrutiny as domestic games.

      • UsernameIsTooLon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        54
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        6 months ago

        As a vietnamese American, my mom always told me stories about the shitty government. Most citizens in Vietnam know the laws are dumb too but can’t protest because the government is too strong now. Just know that EVERYTHING is regulated over there.

          • Rakonat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            30
            ·
            6 months ago

            America literally fought a war to try and prevent that. The majority of the population of Vietnam fought to have this instead.

            • niktemadur@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              One has to wonder what they would have had if it had gone the other way… would they look more like the Philippines, perhaps, or Indonesia? A “strong man” in Saigon with CIA backing on steroids. Because a whole other kind of just as shitty is still just as shitty.

              • Rakonat@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                I think you’re misunderstanding what I said, US fought a war to stop it the spread of Lenin/Stalin styled authoritarian communism and failed. There never really was a chance for a proper democracy to rise up in such an improverished nation when both sides were going to exploit the hell out of poor workers without adding any significant value to the country or help prop up self sufficient industries.

            • ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 months ago

              America literally fought a war to try and prevent that.

              Are you serious?

              America entered the war because France was trying and failing to maintain its slave colony in Vietnam.

              The only thing America was trying to prevent was democracy from manifesting.

            • UsernameIsTooLon@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              That’s what Americans claim to save face. I’m a Vietnamese American and Asian history tends to suck in other nations. America used that narrative to justify invading another country and then dipping out when it was too hard.

              I’m still going to overgeneralize, but here’s the actual history they don’t teach you. (History is much more interesting outside of school).

              From the Vietnamese perspective, they initially didn’t want/need American help, but about HALF of Vietnam didn’t want communism. Similar to Korea, it was kinda like North vs South. America knew that Vietnam has potential to be another booming nation so they saw an opportunity to “help” Vietnam for profit and claim they’re fighting communism in the process. America doesn’t just “help” for the sake of good, we’re a nation of profit and greed.

              During this war, South Korea’s involvement and then eventual American alliance actually helped South Korea flourish from all this new money they were getting. When Nixon saw that Vietnam was a losing war, he pussied out and ended up moving on to help Korea since that was the next “profitable” nation; even helping in “fighting communism” during the Korean War. Vietnam took a huge L after Nixon pumped and pulled resources so he partially caused the loss, too. Looking back now, America made the “right” call on South Korea as it’s now both rich AND has good US relations.

              Most of the Vietnamese population today prefers a less communistic government but not much can be done. Government is just stupid powerful BECAUSE of communism in the first place. Like some long domino effect.

              TL:Dr America is a sneaky country and does things that only benefit them. They couldn’t benefit from Vietnam so they moved onto Korea in “I’m done playing with you” style.

              • OBJECTION!
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                6 months ago

                If the majority of Vietnamese didn’t want communism, why didn’t the anti-communists win even without the US’s help? Your narrative is nonsense.

              • Rakonat@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Geographically it was half the country, but population wise it was closer to 2/3rd pro communist vs 1/3rd anti communist. US involvement wasn’t really justified to start and mostly sunk cost fallacy with how they tried to support the French rule before France pulled out and US was holding the bag and a doctrinal choice of stopping the spread of communism even when there was little to nothing to gain and only save face. Vietnam was going to have a civil war no matter what but US definitely made it worse and drew out the conflict and ramped up the death toll with nothing to show for it. If the US had any intentions of taking advantage of Vietnam modernising and industrializing they’d have setup southern cities that were more friendly to US investments with trafe and infrastructure. But just like in Korea that wouldn’t happen for decades later, US presence there was entirely military and some very bare bones humanitarian aid.

    • PowerCrazy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      107
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      Sounds like the problem here is the “government scrutiny” not steam.

        • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          6 months ago

          Love how people like you have to bring in NATO into everything. As if it has anything to do with Vietnam banning Steam.

                • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I don’t think you have the slightest clue about what NATO actually is.

                  Because they have nothing to do with Vietnam choosing to ban steam.

                • PowerCrazy
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  So if I publish a game on steam I am now a colonizer? If I am a Vietnamese citizen who downloads a game that hasn’t gone through “government scrutiny” am I now a collaborator? What if I am a Vietnamese game developer that has published directly to steam without giving a shit about whatever censorship my government is trying to implement? Should I be sent to reeducation?

    • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      Ooof. What a stupid take.

      There are indie studios whose lives have been changed because they focus on the international market.

      This small brain thinking will ensure they die.

      • Rakonat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        The local devs were not trying to get steam banned. Hell they wanted steam but wanted to play by the same rules and pointed out how strict their own laws and requirements were.

        Vietnam govt said you’re right, it’s not fair and banned steam to make sure everyone plays by their rules rather than admit the rules were stupid and draconic.

      • jsomae
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s not immediately obvious to me that indie developers in Vietnam won’t be able to find an international publisher. While I don’t approve of the law, it does strike me as potentially having a positive effect on Vietnamese studios.

        • shikitohno@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Given how it can be circumvented by fiddling with DNS according to the article, I doubt it’ll really do anything besides stoke negative sentiment towards Vietnamese studios. Besides, you can buy plenty of the games elsewhere, so even if it worked, all you’re accomplishing is making it slightly more annoying for gamers to buy what they want, rather than having it in one place.