• littleblue✨@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      More in line with bourgeoisie, the class term should be “parasitaire”. Hell, it even has Paris in it. 🤪

      • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I like this one because when I was really into MMOs it was interesting to see the birth of exploiter philosophy within the game. Then the positions that the exploiters would always take when it was suggested we crack down on cheating was that they were being unfairly persecuted and their mere presence benefits everyone.

        Even after the exploit was patched they usually got to keep their ill-gotten gains because they would turn what ever it was into intangibles or launder everything.

        It was just a complete microcosm of capitalism. Which can all be summed up by their creedo, “exploit early and exploit often.”

        Even funnier, Steve Bannon had ties with WoW gold farmers.

  • rekabis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    I prefer the term “Parasite Class”.

    Many think the poor to be parasites, but they are actually the opposite.

    After all, what is the mark of a parasite? It makes the host think that it is benign, of no harm whatsoever, and in some cases it even convinces its host that it provides a benefit. All the while it visits the most harmful deprivations upon the host, right up to sucking the lifeblood from it until it dies a horrible death.

    No other tranche of human society matches those attributes more effectively than the wealthy.

    • SattaRIP@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      7 months ago

      I agree, but I’d take it a step further and say the ultra rich are even worse than parasites. Parasites serve a purpose to the stability of their ecosystems. Billionaires just consume.

        • CoolGirl586@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          Even then, viruses are a crucial part of pretty much any ecosystem on the planet. If viruses all disappeared it would be the end of pretty much all complex life on the planet for a while. Maybe forever depending on exactly how crucial they are to evolution as a whole.

          • Muehe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            Well if I learned one thing about biology it is that it eludes simplistic notions as the one presented in the meme, so I get where you are coming from here. However I very much doubt the sudden disappearance of viruses would end complex life or evolution, since there are other avenues of intra-species mutation and inter-species gene transfer. It would doubtlessly upset the balance of pretty much every existing ecosystem of course.

            That said, don’t overthink it, it’s just a meme about the (slightly modified) Agent Smith reference so neatly lying around in the parent comment.

  • masquenox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s not the “predator” class - it’s the parasite class.

    Calling them “predators” will - apart from the fact that it’s inaccurate - simply flatter their egos

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      They do hoard wealth, but in another sense they’re constantly making money moves: shifting their capital here and there, to extract more value from various local economies.

      Hoarding would actually be an improvement. Like a dragon sitting on a pile of gold. But they’re more like rampaging dragon that is never satisfied with its booty

      • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        They extract value from things until there is no more wealth, like mining an ore vein dry or bottling all the water from an aquafer. They hoard that value for themselves and leave nothing of value for others.

  • Valmond@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    For me they are parasites, as they live off of the work of everyone else without contributing.

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Those who subsist off the philanthropy of the workers who build their houses, produce and prepare their food, and subscribe to their pointless rents.

      And these good Samaritan workers do this for a fraction of the value produced, all so that these poor wealthy elites don’t have to engage in real, productive labour.

      Have a heart. It’s a certainty that they would starve without our charity!

    • Zacryon@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      They contribute sometimes by creating jobs, so they can get richer and fatter while still exploiting those who are taking those new jobs.

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Very few highly educated folks are poor, in fact, majority come from money.

      “More than three-quarters of medical students came from families in the top two quintiles of family income”

      https://www.aamc.org/media/9596/download

      I am from a family in the 3rd quartile, nobody ever said I could grow up to be a Doctor. Most told me to ‘go to state school and get a shitty office job and be happy with it’. In my college all the kids studying to be med students were driving used BMWs/Mercedes and paying several grand extra a year for parking, new dorms, and the like.

  • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I don’t call them the elite… I will continue to not call them elite if that helps.

    • Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Parasite is much more applicable.

      The parasites manipulate the predators to handle the suckers they trap with news nooses.

    • oatscoop@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Or “journalists” trying to smear people they don’t like. FOX likes to call anyone that’s rich and left of “fascist” the “liberal elite.”

  • Garbanzo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I don’t think I’ve ever seen anyone making less than six figures actually call them that

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Wait, elite are wealthy? I thought I was a “Coastal Elite Libtard” because I live in a coastal state, am educated, sit at a desk, and earn more than median wage even after adjusting for high cost of living. I worked hard for that college education (many years ago before inflation took it out of reach), now i have to be wealthy too?

    Dammit, MAGAts have much simpler criteria and cheaper land, maybe I need to swerve hard right and land in a flyover state