On Tuesday and Wednesday, Cubana de Aviacion flights to Buenos Aires were canceled because fuel suppliers in Argentina refused to serve the airline.

The companies have invoked “provisions of the United States blockade against Cuba” to not supply the aircraft of the Cuban state airline.

Additionally, this measure has affected other airlines contracted by Cubana de Aviacion, preventing them from fulfilling commitments to passengers.

This surprising decision took place despite the Cuban flights being approved by the Argentina’s National Civil Aviation Administration (ANAC).

In response to this situation, the airline has decided to assist affected passengers in Cuba by sending them back on flights operated by other airlines connecting to Argentina. Other passengers will be eligible for a full refund of their airfare. ⠀

During the first quarter of 2024, the Cuban airline transported 3,221 passengers with an occupancy rate of 61 percent. The number of Argentine travelers to Cuba increased by 44 percent compared to the same period last year, reaching 12,753 people.

Archive link

    • Arelin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      That was in response to the US placing similar missiles in Turkey and Italy and threatening the USSR in 1961.

      I don’t see Russia putting an embargo on those two now 60 years later. Though ig that’s not a one-to-one comparison since Russia’s ruled by capitalists now.

      • andyburke@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I am not here arguing for or against sanctions. I am saying that there is a specific historical incident which is the current justification for the status quo.

        • PolandIsAStateOfMind
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          This was 62 years ago, if just the crisis was the reason, it would be gone long ago, at least since 1991. No, the true reason is that thriving socialist state in a beret toss distance from USA would undermine US imperialism greatly. Remember that entire capitalism hinges on the propaganda that “socialism don’t work”, and while it demostrably do work, it’s always some far away so it can be propagandized and demonised to hell and back, so when they got one right beside them, they must sabotage it with all strenght.