• davelA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    @yogthos@lemmy.ml, I think this post title is a bridge too far. It’s a complete break from the headline’s letter and spirit.

      • davelA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Not having paid close enough attention, I have no idea if/how much Ansar Allah influenced this move.

        FWIW, sometimes I put some editorializing—usually in brackets—in a post title, or else I put it in the body of the post. And sometimes I post to a comm that’s more appropriate for editorializing. I’m not a c/worldnews mod, though.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          I just felt like being snarky with this one, but yeah the body of the post is a good spot for that too.

  • jws_shadotak@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Edit: original title was “USS Eisenhower flees Red Sea” or something like that

    Dumbfuck OP doesn’t understand ship rotations.

    The Ike was set to leave the red sea to return home. Even while in the Mediterranean, its aircraft can still conduct missions in the Red Sea.

    Regular ship rotation

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      sure yeah

      Ike‘s departure from the Red Sea leaves U.S. Central Command region without a carrier strike group or amphibious ready group for the first time since October, when the Houthi attacks began following the Hamas attacks on Israel and the subsequent Israeli bombardment of Gaza.