A North Texas man has filed a class action lawsuit against Cinemark, claiming the movie theater chain is lying to customers about the size of its drinks.

Shane Waldrop claims that Cinemark’s 24 ounce cups can only hold 22 ounces of liquid, according to the lawsuit filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.

On Feb. 14, Waldrop went to the Cinemark in Grapevine and purchased the 20 ounce and 24 ounce draft beer.

He noticed the 24 ounce cup did not appear to be big enough to hold 4 more ounces of liquid.

Waldrop took the empty container home and measured how much it could hold, discovering it only held 22 ounces.

Waldrop and his legal team says the movie theater chain is taking part in “deceptive” and “otherwise improper” business practices that violate state and federal laws about misbranding.

“This is especially misleading because the 24 oz drink should provide a deal for consumers over the 20 oz drink’s price: $0.37 per ounce vs. $0.39 per ounce. But due to the actual volume of 22 oz available in the ‘24 oz’ drink, the price is $0.40 per ounce making the larger drink more expensive per ounce, which is not a deal at all,” reads the lawsuit.

    • trolololol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      247
      ·
      1 month ago

      I do too, but I wonder what kind of mental problem that guy has to invest money in lawyer and court fees, plus tons of personal time, to get this going.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        151
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        The mental illness known as “tired of everyone getting fucked with no recourse”

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        50
        ·
        1 month ago

        The lawyer probably took the case on a contingent basis (doesn’t get paid unless he wins), and the dude will probably get a fat check. That’s not a mental problem, that’s cashing in big on a corporate lie he discovered.

            • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Pretty lucrative for the lawyers. Each person who has ordered a beer in the past few years will get a check in the mail for 3¢, and a coupon for a free beer next time they go.

            • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              each member of the class is gonna get the cash value of 2 oz beer * number of short beers they bought * .6 (assuming 40% attorneys fees). Nobody’s retiring off this money.

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah but everyone knows being anything other than a conniving mole is a sign “mental illness”. The only legitimate way to live is like a scurrying beetle, telling whatever lies one can to gain favor with the elite.

          • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            We’ve gotten so used to oligarchy that we don’t even see it when it has infected us. That’s scary and sad at the same time.

      • umbrella
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        i wonder what kind of mental illness some already rich bigwig has to have to defraud even our fucking soda

      • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        i guess a dash of autism.

        If anything this is a good example of how society would be worse off if everyone were neurotypical

        that or our hero is just bored and petty as fuck!

      • originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        The mental problem of wanting to earn a lot of money in a lawsuit. Mans gonna get three, maybe even four bucks outta this

            • intensely_human@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 month ago

              Hopefully it’s about sending a message that casually dropping 10% of delivered goods as a matter of policy isn’t going to fly.

              I hope the judge makes it hurt for Cinemark, assuming this was actual policy and not just a case of them using different cups that day from being out of the normal ones.

      • yeather@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        None, these types of cases barely ever go to trial, they will end with a settlement of which the lawyers will take a portion as compensation.

        • Hildegarde@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Judges decide the law, juries decide the facts. Juries are only needed if there is a material dispute of the facts. I doubt this case would have a jury even if it didn’t end in a settlement.

        • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yup lawyers who take these kinds of cases that are easy wins, do it on contingency. If they don’t think you have a good case they tell you, and then charge you hourly.

          • trolololol@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I’m missing understanding some things here, but how much is the case about to handout in money? And shouldn’t the guy here split it between himself and lawyers?

            • yeather@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Depends on what the guy and the cinema agree upon to make this go away. Usually the lawyers will take 30-40% of a settlement.

  • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    In Canada a pint is a legal measurement of 20oz / 568ml

    If you advertise beer on the menu as a pint, it must be at least 19.5oz excluding head(allowable margin of error)

    What happens though is countless places advertise a pint, and then give you something like 16-18oz which is against the law.

    It’s gets harder tell what you’re getting as well when they serve in non standard pint glasses, or glasses without a pint mark.

  • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    If this guy doesn’t get a “we salute you” ad by the beer companies, there’s no justice left in the world.

    • AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 month ago

      Having owned, partly owned, or at least been very friendly with restaurant and bar owners…

      …no, no they do not. Maybe they do if you end up on some radar or something, or get reported? But in general day to day and inspections, no.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        In the UK, and I suspect in other countries as well, you have to use the right cups and glasses for the right drinks. So for beer you will have to use the beer glass that the brewery provide. I don’t think you can just go out and get any old cup from a shop and use that. You have to use the calibrated ones.

      • weariedfae@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Apologies, I should have been more specific. I meant does some sort of regulation or team or anything involving weights and measures exist at all for food service? Or is the only thing the theaters did “wrong” in this case false advertising?

        I understand enforcement for an FDA regulation/whatever may be lacking. I’ve worked in a restaurant and other food service related places before but I was young and pretty low level so I wasn’t super tuned into the business side let alone laws/regulations outside of basic food handling.

  • jaybone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    No one will care. They will pay whatever fine, and pay whatever members of this class, and then they will keep doing the same shit.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      If they keep doing the same shit I’ll sue them again, citing their previous lawsuit and any injunctive relief ordered in the previous trial when presenting my case.

      • irotsoma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        They’ll just call it something different and hide the size in small print. Or they’ll increase the price so that the large is still $.40 per oz since people don’t usually do the math these days and just assume larger things are a better deal. A lot of times they aren’t anymore because companies don’t care as much about selling a lot as they do about profit on the sale due to there not being much competition with all the consolidation.

    • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 month ago

      Wouldn’t this mean that beer would need to be 8% more dense than water for this to work out? Quickly searching online, it seems like beer is more like 1% more dense than water, depending on the type of beer, so not sure this is possible.

        • funnystuff97@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 month ago

          1 fl oz (volume) of water weighs about 1 oz (weight). It varies depending on a bunch of stuff, ya know, cause imperial sucks, but I believe the standard rate is 1 fl oz weighs about 1.043 oz. So assuming beer has similar density as water, 22 fl oz would weigh somewhere around 23 oz.

          (Some Google searches show that some definitions of fl oz has it as 1 fl oz = 30 ml exactly, but I’m starting to confuse myself and you know how infuriating imperial is.)

          • Phrodo_00@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            The US customary units are officially defined on top of metric, and 1 fl oz is 29.5735295625 mL, but an oz is 28.349523125 g. I imagine this decision was just to fuck with people (since 1ml of water weighs 1g at sea level, at 4°)

  • Panda (he/him)@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Waldrop took the empty container home and measured how much it could hold, discovering it only held 22 ounces.

    Bro really pulled out the scientific instruments and everything 😭

  • Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    That old thing where they stopped dispensing 24 oz of beer and some idiot decided not to buy 24 oz cups anymore to save more money.

  • sygnius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    36
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m usually against frivolous cases like this over nothing, but if he actually did measure that it’s impossible to hold 24 oz in a cup labeled that way, then he does have a good case. I think the case would be more on the supplier that provides the cups to Cinemark though, and less on the theater that’s taking the word of the supplier.

    • RavindraNemandi@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      112
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is only frivolous if you think of it as being about 2 ounces of beer. Its not. Its about hundreds of thousands of people paying for something that they did not recieve. When you add it all up its quite a lot of stolen money! Also its absolutely Cinemark’s fault, even assuming they were given the wrong cups by the distributor (which is a bad assumption) its on Cinemark to make sure they are providing what they claim they are.

    • loobkoob@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think the case would be more on the supplier that provides the cups to Cinemark though

      That’s a matter for Cinemark and their supplier to sort out (either through discussion or another lawsuit). This man had a contract with the vendor (Cinemark) which is why he’s suing them.