• FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    36
    ·
    7 months ago

    We do?

    I could care less about the price of concert tickets. Even if I could afford trips regularly, I still wouldn’t. Concerts are like hell to me.

    • jeffw@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Do you care about monopolies though? Whether it’s concerts or something else, we should all despise monopolies

      • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s almost like monopolies are a symptom of the real problem. I wonder what actually causes monopolies?

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        26
        ·
        7 months ago

        If you really think that Live Nation needs the first to be toppled… might I introduce you to Nestle? Cargill? Unilever, Bayer. Monsanto. LN might be scummy, and they certainly need to be dealt with, but they’re far from the only thing, and they’re certainly more of a symptom than the problem itself.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Holy whataboutism, Batman!

          Just because other awful companies exist doesn’t mean that Ticketmaster/Live Nation should get to bleed people dry.

          And they may be “just” a symptom, but a tumor will kill you just as much as the underlying cancer will.

          • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            20
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Damn fucking straight it’s a fucking whataboutism.

            People cannot afford to go to concerts. Oh fucking boo fucking boo.

            People can’t afford their groceries or to pay their rent.

            You’re acting like going to a concert is a basic fucking necessity.

            In case you’re wondering. Yes I am fucking pissed. If Biden was half as concerned about starving families as he was swifts ticket prices… he might not be in a dead heat with an angry, insurrectionist, rapist, racist, misogynistic grifter whose facing over 90 felony indictments.

            • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              7 months ago

              Damn fucking straight it’s a fucking whataboutism.

              You DO know that those are bad, right? That they’re a logical fallacy and just generally a shitty way to argue a point by not arguing it? Clearly you either don’t know or don’t care.

              People cannot afford to go to concerts. Oh fucking boo fucking boo.

              Guess what? Music is important to the vast majority of people and, unlike you and me, most people prefer to experience it live.

              You’re acting like going to a concert is a basic fucking necessity.

              Yeah, enjoying life once in a while is crucial to your mental health. Big surprise, I know 🙄

              In case you’re wondering. Yes I am fucking pissed.

              Good! Nobody reasonable is saying you shouldn’t be.

              If Biden was half as concerned about starving families as he was swifts ticket prices…

              There you go again… Two things can be wrong independently of each other. Besides, Biden isn’t even the one trying the case, so there’s no way the two things are a zero sum binary.

              he might not be in a dead heat with an angry, insurrectionist, rapist, racist, misogynistic grifter whose facing over 90 felony indictments.

              Insisting on being the chief supplier of a genocide certainly doesn’t help either. Anyway, still irrelevant.

              • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                Biden, and his FTC has limited resources. He’s expending tax-payer-funded effort. It’s a basic cost-benefit analysis I expect better and more prudent decisions from lowest level of supervisors in my management chain.

                It’s a fallacy when they’re otherwise unrelated. They’re not unrelated in that going after one precludes the other. The FTC can only handle so many at once- and it’s Biden’s job to give them the top-level direction.

                Biden is unwilling or incapable of doing what’s necessary to protect Americans- actual, breathing Americans.

                As for experiencing live music… yeah. I get that. There’s plenty of avenues for experiencing live music that don’t involve live nation. You don’t have to go to the top stars; and chances are solid, you’ll like the experience better.

                Biden is the one directing the trade commission to go after them, so yes, it’s about Biden and his priorities. Which apparently, American families are not.

                Two things can be independently wrong. But as is the entire point I’ve been trying to make, the resources to solve them are limited. Biden, the FTC, doesn’t have the ability to go after everyone.

                • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Biden, and his FTC has limited resources

                  Nowhere near as limited as you seem to be imagining.

                  They’re not unrelated in that going after one precludes the other

                  That’s just categorically false.

                  Biden is unwilling or incapable of doing what’s necessary to protect Americans- actual, breathing Americans.

                  I’d be inclined to agree with you on that, but that’s still besides the point.

                  There’s plenty of avenues for experiencing live music that don’t involve live nation.

                  No there isn’t. That’s the problem. Bands below a certain level of popularity only get rare booking at low capacity venues and bands above that level almost invariably depend on TM/LN to book larger venues.

                  The end result is that no matter whose music you prefer, you’re not likely to get to experience it anywhere near as often as you’d like without going bankrupt, unless you’re rich.

                  You don’t have to go to the top stars; and chances are solid, you’ll like the experience better.

                  Yeah, sometimes the “top stars” are the favorites of people and/or their peer group. It’s not a fungible thing where if you’re only into punk, a jazz festival will do in a pinch.

        • jeffw@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          I don’t think any of those have 80% of their respective markets though. Not defending any of those companies, just saying it isn’t an open and shut case.

          And a lot of stuff with Nestle and Cargill in environmental, so it happens outside of the USA afaik

          • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yet every single one of those affects every American. Quite possibly everyone across the globe. LN only really affects you if you’re in that industry or go to a concert/events.

            Nestle is fucking evil. There’s no other way to put it. They hold so many brands, that they don’t need 80% market share. I doubt very much that any American that wants to seriously boycott them even has a choice.

            Same goes with Cargill or Monsanto. Cargill is responsible for a lot of the ag waste generated, being one of the largest producers of beef, and eggs as well as poultry, pork. From producing feed to farms that raise the animals.

            Monsanto can literally force farmers to use their seed if any farmer even remotely close also uses their seed. (Ostensibly because gmo seeds are patented and cross pollination violates IP rights).

            • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              LN only really affects you if you’re in that industry or go to a concert/events

              Yeah, they only affect the business of and most people’s favorite way to enjoy one of the main types of human creative endeavor, no biggie!

              Nestle is fucking evil. There’s no other way to put it. They hold so many brands, that they don’t need 80% market share. I doubt very much that any American that wants to seriously boycott them even has a choice.

              Absolutely true but also completely beside the point.

              Same goes with Cargill or Monsanto. Cargill is responsible for a lot of the ag waste generated, being one of the largest producers of beef, and eggs as well as poultry, pork. From producing feed to farms that raise the animals.

              Again, yes, but that ALSO doesn’t make Ticketmaster/Live Nation any better

              Monsanto can literally force farmers to use their seed if any farmer even remotely close also uses their seed. (Ostensibly because gmo seeds are patented and cross pollination violates IP rights).

              Again true, except Monsanto got bought by Bayer a few years ago. I’ve been unable to find out how much of their evil fuckery they’re still doing under the new name (which is probably because of a deliberate cover job by Bayer), but my guess would be “most, if not all of it”

              That STILL doesn’t mean that an effective monopoly should ever be allowed to charge the equivalent of a car for a single concert ticket.

              • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                7 months ago

                Missing the point. Again.

                Run the cost. Benefit analysis. Each of those mega corps affect every American every day. And not in any positive way.

                  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    Oh?

                    So you’re saying that breaking one of those companies would help fewer people than live nation?

                    You’re saying that tens of millions of people living with food and housing insecurity is less of a problem than people not being able to afford concert and other tickets?

                    Explain it to me because you seem to have weird priorities.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      I don’t like going to concerts either, but that doesn’t mean I think it’s acceptable that people who want to are charged half their yearly income to go to one.

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        My problem isn’t the ticket prices - because the groups I go see aren’t hugely popular I’ve never paid more than $30 for a ticket - but the way it hurts artists. Having one conglomerate controlling the ticket sales and the venues means artists have less negotiating power. With the collapse of music sales, most artists make most of their money from touring, and getting screwed by LiveNation means fewer bands touring.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          My problem is both tbh. Thanks for bringing up the other half of the suck sandwich that everyone had neglected mentioning until now.

          • Esqplorer@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            7 months ago

            I was actually saying the opposite, that we need more done about income protections so people can afford stuff. “Given all other evidence” meaning the mountains of information we see about inflation…

            • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              7 months ago

              The problem with concert tickets isn’t inflation. It’s the Live Nation/Ticketmaster monopoly that controls both the venue and the sales vehicle. They own all the best venues, disallow artists to use any other way to sell tickets that aren’t Ticketmaster, and charge both the artists and the consumers exorbitant fees.

              They’re making money on both ends of the transaction because of their monopoly on live music.

              • Esqplorer@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                I didn’t say high ticket prices was inflation. I was explaining my original “evidence” comment was to reflect inflation not “don’t be poor” and now I’m being critiqued for not re-writing the original story in the comments like people seem to want.

                I hate Ticketmaster as much as anyone, and think the DOJ should absolutely pursue them, but the fact people can’t afford ticket prices is also because people are stretched financially more than ever before, which is a much bigger issue than just

                I’m going to assume someone will now down vote me for not predicting some other third assumption that they will jump to. Great!

    • Godnroc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      Expensive hell. Not only do you get to suffer, you have to pay heavily for the privilege!

    • affiliate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I could care less about the price of concert tickets.

      i can see that based on how much you’ve argued against lowering ticket prices