I’m assuming that they are reporting r as the correlation coefficient (Pearson’s).
They range from -0.2 to 0.2, so ‘barely’ correlated, to ‘not’ correlated. This looks like some thin ass broth to be publishing on.
Also, it doesn’t look like they controlled for multicolinearity, which is kind of a ‘well duh’ consideration for these variables. Overall I don’t think multiple linear regression makes sense for these data.
I’m assuming that they are reporting r as the correlation coefficient (Pearson’s).
They range from -0.2 to 0.2, so ‘barely’ correlated, to ‘not’ correlated. This looks like some thin ass broth to be publishing on.
Also, it doesn’t look like they controlled for multicolinearity, which is kind of a ‘well duh’ consideration for these variables. Overall I don’t think multiple linear regression makes sense for these data.