• Andrew@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    You barely can control cursor with your brain, it is impossible for the chip to control what you see. Maybe in a century…

      • Andrew@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s been several centuries and yet the brain is still a big mystery for the humanity. I don’t think 2 decades would be enough. I’m not saying that I’m against cool technologies, but such a progress is hard to imagine being done so “soon”.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            Technological progress can follow an exponential curve. It doesn’t have to. Which is why we’re still using the same basic pacemakers that were invented in the 1950s. Nothing better has been invented for people who have the sort of heart conditions that require pacemakers.

            • photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              8 months ago

              Yeah, you’re right, it’s more of an S-curve for any particular technology. But I doubt we’ve seen the climax of brain-machine-interfaces.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                I hope not for the sake of paralyzed people and the like, but I wouldn’t trust an Elon Musk company to be the one to do it.

          • Andrew@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Just feels unimaginable. But it’s interesting to see what the future will bring us.

            • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              I’m massively optimistic about the rate of tech development, I think we’ll have some really world changing things in twenty years but I really cant see brain implanted AR being a thing for a long time

    • Catsrules
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      And you will never need more than 640kb of ram. :)

    • InputZero
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      What is your benchmark for success? A brain chip that can augment reality? In my opinion the real potential for a brain chip is more of a technology to expand accessibility to people who can’t control their bodies. Also in my opinion, no one should trust Elon Musk or anything he makes so Neural Link I don’t think highly of. The potential to provide people with severe mobility challenges another means to interact with the world is something worth developing. That I can see happening in a decade or two. A general purpose brain chip, yeah a hundred years plus, if ever.

      • TheFriar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        Under capitalism? I wouldn’t trust any sort of tech implant. I say that from the comfort of my full physical faculties, so maybe it’d be different if I couldn’t, but Jesus I cannot imagine being at the whim of any tech company.

        • lseif@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          neuralink. and im not directing this at you specifically, but anyone who will get the implant, believing that it’s read-only