Alabama Governor Kay Ivey signed into law on Wednesday a ban on diversity, equity and inclusion programs in public schools, making the state one of a few to enact broad measures against what she and other Republicans call a leftward tilt in U.S. education.

The bill, which passed Alabama’s Republican-led legislature on Tuesday, bans public schools from maintaining diversity, equity and inclusion offices or teaching what the bill calls “divisive concepts” about race and identity, such as that of holding people of one race responsible for actions committed by the same racial group in the past.

It also requires public institutions of higher education to designate bathrooms as only for males or females, a move that counters transgender rights advocates’ push for gender-neutral bathrooms.

  • jeffw@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    God forbid a business just has a single bathroom with one toilet, what would we do?!

    • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Well, the racist transphobic governor gramma seems to believe we’d all have the vapors.

        • Illuminostro@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 months ago

          “Being gay is a choice. I know because I choose to be straight, in spite of all the naughty dreams I have about Tom Cruise.”

          • cmoney@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Not sure how you came to that conclusion, my point was that some people are in denial about who they really are and use homophobia as a cover.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              The whole ‘homophobes are secretly gay’ thing, while there are some examples where that is true, essentially blames gay people for their own oppression.

              It also doesn’t reflect any other type of bigotry I can think of.

              If you said something like ‘antisemites are secretly Jews,’ everyone would think you were nuts. But somehow ‘if you hate queer people, you’re probably one of them’ is widely accepted amongst progressive people.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  My logic suggests the exact opposite. That the root of bigotry is bigots, not the people they are bigoted against.

                  • cmoney@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    And I’m saying that gay people as well as Jewish people can also be bigoted towards each other, but I’m not suggesting that they are the root of why the bigotry existed in the first place.

      • jeffw@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Shhh, don’t remind them or they’ll make you build extra bathrooms in your home

        • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          The bathroom separation originates from the Victorian era, and in richer households, they even had separate living rooms.

      • perviouslyiner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Buildings such as the pentagon ended up with an excess of bathrooms because they had white/coloured and men/women (plus presumably disabled?)

    • BreakDecks
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      Imagining a public school or university with a single toilet for the whole campus is pretty funny.

      On a side note, why is there always a highly upvoted comment on every thread like this that deliberately misinterprets the story? The headline isn’t even ambiguous, this comment is pure misinformatiin. Are ~50 of you really that bad at reading?

      It seems pretty convenient that every story about regressive right wing policy includes highly visible misinfo about it. It makes me wonder how organic the upvotes for this drivel really are.

      • DABDA@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 months ago

        What exactly is pure misinformation within the comment? It’s ambiguously phrased I’ll grant, but clearly they mean a “single bathroom” as in not designated for any specific gender.

        • BreakDecks
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          That this applies to private businesses.

          • DABDA@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            And where exactly does the word “private” appear in their comment?