• LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think that may start to happen but it’s going to be gradual. That said I have no problem with irrigation if it’s from well managed, sustainable supplies of water and it’s produces enough food to justify its use. I think we’re moving in that direction though slower than I’d prefer.

    • sin_free_for_00_days@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Along those lines, I’m really curious why they haven’t installed floating solar down the aquaducts. Seems like it would be cheap and efficient.

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not familiar with this technology but it could be worth looking into! I guess the question is whether the reduction evaporation and land cost makes up for what I assume will be more expensive to install and maintain.

        • sin_free_for_00_days@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve just watched a couple videos like this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZXV2p73vcE and it sure seems like that canals would be a decent fit. The state wouldn’t have to deal with regulation issues (I think, I’m far from an expert) because the land is already working for the state.

          Then again, I have fantastic ideas all the time, but they usually spring from a foundation of frightening ignorance of details.

          • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah interesting but it always comes down to the economics which I’m no expert on. I have a buddy who is a former solar engineer so maybe so will ask his opinion on this.