• Limonene@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Tiktok has some serious problems with censorship. It’s been absolutely proven that Tiktok censors content that the Chinese government dislikes. Even if Tiktok/Bytedance insists that they aren’t owned by the Chinese government, they are owned by Chinese entities, which subjects them to Chinese government censorship, and may require them to deny that censorship.

    The study: https://networkcontagion.us/wp-content/uploads/A-Tik-Tok-ing-Timebomb_12.21.23.pdf

    Article about the study: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/21/business/tiktok-china.html

    Antipaywall link to that article: https://archive.ph/MLATC

    I don’t disagree that Facebook, Youtube, and Twitter have their own set of things they censor. I don’t disagree that Tiktok is being singled out by Congress. I don’t disagree that there are big privacy problems with all of the above platforms.

  • Ech@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I’m not gonna suggest that it’s right that US companies often evade government scrutiny and action, but I also don’t think it’s hypocritical for a country to be interested in protecting itself from other countries. That’s just national interest. We need protections within the country too, but that’s not the same conversation.

    And tbh, the meme is pretty on point because a family may treat each other poorly often, but they are much less accepting of an outside party doing the same as it can be seen as a risk to the group at large.

    • MagnyusG@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      people seem to glaze over the fact that China is at odds with the United States politically, the ban has little to do with protecting people’s privacy and more to do with preventing another country from having such an influential tool ready at their fingertips.

      • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Not to mention how the local area average content algorithm is a known tool of those foreign policing units to keep Chinese nationals abroad in line even when they specifically avoid downloading anything the CCP could normally use to keep an eye on them.

        People are getting mad that their right to participate in the extraterritorial oppression of Chinese folks is being infringed because it also involves them getting to watch videos of reddit drama stories set to shitty Minecraft parkour.

      • GladiusB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Bull. Being at odds with someone is about protection. We should want our information to be free from whatever they want it for. I don’t like the bigger US companies doing it either. But that is usually for profit. Who knows what a foreign nation that hates us wants it for.

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        7 months ago

        China is at odds with the United States politically

        Most sane and freedom loving people are also at odds with United States politically.

        I think the US government is upset that China has provided people with a way to communicate and organize that has actually been effective.

    • assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      I find it hypocritical that America forces it’s tech down other countries throats and demands open markets globally while wanting to now close off their market once they have a viable foreign competitor. I agree it’s logically the right move but, I still find it hypocritical.

    • tswiftchair@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I think the most hypocritical part is obviously the guise of data privacy. But even regarding national security or foreign influence, I think there is some hypocrisy because we know that there are foreign actors on Facebook, for example, as well.

    • NevermindNoMind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      Back in my day we had an open internet. But “China bad” has gotten to the point where we’re ok with the government deciding which countries are allowed to have apps in the US market. I definitely don’t see any problems with establishing that kind of precedent.

      If your worried about China influencing and/or spying on US citizens via a social media app, there are things the US could do short of a forced sale or outright ban (and not an actual ban btw, this is the government telling app stores what apps they’re allowed to carry, another super cool precedent). Maybe a public education campaign, like DARE but for tik tok, maybe it’s convincing influencers to switch platforms, maybe it’s dumping some money into alternatives like the fediverse. Or you could just wait a year or two until TikTok loses popularity like every other social media platform ever.

      Anyway, we need to stop pretending this argument is about anything like spying or Chinese mind control. For Republicans it’s simply China bad. For Democrats it’s about protecting meta and Google, donors, from TikTok kicking their ass in the free market.

      It’s dumb, short sighted, a horrible precedent, and people cheer it on at their own perril.

  • jacktherippah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    You know what? Good. Fuck China. Fuck the CCP. Fuck TikTok. My country borders China and has active territorial disputes with it. When I last went on Facebook I saw people from my country reposting TikTok content from China. They actually fucking support China in all of its territorial disputes, they think that China is the greatest country in the world and they want it to have the nine dash line basically. Really? Supporting a totalian regime, a hostile foreign power? Really?

    • twig@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yes, 100%.

      There are way too many fucking tankies on this platform and they need to be reminded of this.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      If I download that app I am not doing it because I endorse any of the policies of the Mainland Taiwan I am doing it I want to get content.

  • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    7 months ago

    Man the fuck is up with the amount of pro-Chinese-Dictatorship memes?

    Fuck the CCP, all my homies hate the CCP! Some other unethical asshole can buy TikTok and it’ll still be an improvement.

  • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 months ago

    Way more people than I would have expected in here - a social media site who’s entire purpose is to be free from corporate ownership and control - upset this meme is too soft on China, instead of in agreement that legislators should be addressing the entire social media platform market (and china’s platform with it)

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    To solve this problem, I’m thinking of just getting a dumb phone again, and maybe throwing out all of my other electronics. Actually, I’ll have to just move to the middle of the woods somewhere with no electricity to get actual privacy.

    Man this sucks. I wish we could all just mind our own business.

    • Neato@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 months ago

      We have never, at any point in human civilization, ever just minded our own business.

      • assembly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Don’t think that’s humanities M.O. we kinda tend to be in each others shit constantly. If there is anything we need to learn as a species it’s to focus on our own shit.

        • Neato@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          The only reason humanity has a civilization is its preoccupation with its members shit. You see this in some other intelligent group species. Wolves, apes, anything with group dynamics. Enforcing conformity was essential to survival. You can argue that’s no longer necessary, but it’s how we evolved.

    • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      idk. i think you just don’t need all the “smart” devices in your hut in the woods. electricity is fine. we had solar panels in dumb calculators and dumb watches for >20 years. plus the dumb stuff needs even less electricity and is easy to repair. you can have a dumb mixer, dumb fridge, dumb washing machine, dumb dishwasher and a vacuum, just not a roomba that scans your home while it cleans.

      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Funny you mention dumb devices.I’ve been searching for a dumb TV now for a bit, can’t find them anymore. It’s so annoying that everything is connected to the internet now. I don’t need my entire life hooked into the internet.

        • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          yeah, anything media is hard to get without “smart” stuff, but you don’t need the bluetooth enabled shaver, trust me.

          i also bought a tv/monitor recently and the size and features i wanted were only available on a smart one, but i never connected it to the web. it just complains about it in a grey box top right every start. it probably uses a bit more electricity, because of a proper CPU running all the time.

        • wjrii@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Probably not in stores, but you can get PC monitors up to about 43", and there are also “commercial signage” or “business” displays which are about $150-200 more than a similarly spec’ed smart TV from the same company (lots of Samsungs on Amazon), and may not come with a stand or possibly speakers. Some smart TVs also let you switch inputs without connecting to WiFi. I think most mainstream media projectors are not smart yet, though it’s creeping into that space as well. If everything else is already tracking you, I do tend to wonder how much worse the TV is, but there are ways to pay for a little less privacy invasion from your “TV.”

        • TheKingBee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I’ve been searching for a dumb TV now for a bit, can’t find them anymore

          Every TV can be a dumb TV if you don’t give it your wifi password…

  • twinnie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s because they’re shipping all the user data back to China despite repeatedly promising they wouldn’t.

    • underisk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      do you believe, for even a single moment, that all the US-based companies selling our data are not selling it in China?

    • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      This is the red herring that the CCP is throwing out all over social media for us. They want to conflate support for Palestine with TikTok use, and shift the narrative away from the problems with TikTok’s doomerism-inducing algorithms of intentionally addictive and divisive content.

      • underisk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        From famous CCP propaganda outlet, the Wall Street Journal:

        Gallagher is well-liked by Democrats and his GOP colleagues and respected as an expert on the issue. His efforts appeared to stall in 2023, but were revived in part by the fallout from the Oct. 7 attack by Hamas on Israel, according to people close to TikTok and people close to lawmakers. TikTok’s users quickly inundated the platform with videos about the attack and Israel’s war on Gaza. Some lawmakers said TikTok appeared to favor pro-Palestinian and anti-Israel content, and renewed calls to ban the app in the U.S.

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah definitely not a campaign that the ADL has been heavily pushing for lately to maintain control over their propaganda narratives.

    • Prophet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Why do people deny this? I think it is maybe somewhat difficult to see through the smokescreen but the timing of all this is what makes it so obvious. I am not a tiktok user but I’ve seen the pro-palestine content that is so prevalent there and just the sheer volume of it. The US was more or less fine with China harvesting our data for years before this, but suddenly now we have to ban it in 6 months?? It is entirely about Israel and anti-Israeli government sentiment.

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    honestly, i just don’t really care, unless you want to try and argue first amendment, i think that’s the only realistic outcome here.

  • Yamainwitch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    You can’t just make me spit out my wine with this incredible Simpsons meme hahaha jk I love it 🤣