• xkforce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    They dont. It just happens that natural selection favored flowers that looked vaguely bird like and over time, flowers that looked more and more like a bird outcompeted the ones that looked less like one.

    • orphiebaby@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      What’s funny is how absurd this is. Most flowers don’t look like birds and they’re fine.

      • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        This has nothing to do with natural selection. It’s just a coincidence that the buds very shortly and from a specific angle vaguely look like birds.

        Most of the images shared are probably photoshopped to enhance the effect too.

      • Zink@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s about tiny percents.

        A bird will land on a flower.

        A bird will not land on a bird.

        So every one in a million time a bird mistakes a flower for a bird, that’s a flower that survives.

        All you have to do is wait a couple million years for the odds to turn in the bird flower’s favor.

        • orphiebaby@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          …But birds pollinate flowers. How is a bird not landing on this (particular, too) flower going to help it survive?

  • marcos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    “Appear to look like”…

    I wonder what they look like if you manage to ignore the appearances.

  • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    9 months ago

    Animals are something plants invented to help spread their seeds around.

    • Tylix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Know what’s wild? For millions of years nothing around ate trees, so when a tree grew and died and fell it was permanently there because there was no rot. Which is how we got petrified forests.

      • bananabenana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        From my readings, I don’t think this is the case. Lignin degradation evolved rapidly with terrestrial plants. Coal and petrified wood is more due to geological events and swamps for example. Evolving ligninases is trivial for bacteria and fungi.

      • lorty@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Isn’t that more because of the lack of fungi that could break down wood?

    • Neil
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      9 months ago

      Life in general is most likely something the universe invented to speed up entropy.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    9 months ago

    “…how birds look like…”

    Just one of many issues with the English here.

    • what it looks like
    • how it looks

    You need to pick a lane.

    • Squirrel@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I typically assume it’s a non-native speaker with things like this, but I’m not sure in this case.

      • Old_Fat_White_Guy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        I too try to give the benefit of the doubt when reading stilted text that basically conveys the meaning but the syntax is janky.

        I’m in southern Ohio so there are quite a few people from the hills and hollers around here.

        Methany definitely talks exactly like how that is.

    • cinnamonTea
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I’d read this with commas around ‘like’, rather than with a period after it: “… how birds look, like, I’m afraid” works as a sentence while “… how birds look like. I’m afraid” is both wrong, like you point out, but also sounds much more serious than the jokey tone I’d expect from a message without punctuation and capitalization

    • PunnyName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      Did you understand what was being communicated? Yes? Congratulations!

      Because, really, that’s generally all that’s necessary.

    • HiddenLayer5
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      No they’re asking how do birds look like the way they do. In which case the answer is that a bird’s body evolved to be streamlined and lightweight in order to fly more efficiently. /s

  • Zerush
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    There are a lot of weird flowers out there

    Evolution is wonderfull

      • Zerush
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        The fruit is, but not the plant, scientific name: Tetrastigma voinieranum, common names: Chestnut Vine, Lizard Vine, Wild Grape

      • FarFarAway@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        If you’re into books, it’s also the first book in the Southern Reach Trilogy. The movie was good, but the books really flesh out the situation. I was sad they didn’t continue the movies with the rest of the books.

      • Amanduh@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Just looked it up and it seems like a movie me and my wife would love. I’m surprised I’ve never seen or heard of it… do you have any more movie recs?

        • PunnyName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Guess it depends on what you like. I would say that Annihilation is a good starting point for cosmic horror, and Event Horizon - I feel - falls into that. Prolly Sphere, too.

          My favorite sci-fi films are Bicentennial Man, The Matrix, Interstellar, Arrival, The Man From Earth, and Another Earth.

          The best Halloween film I’ve seen is Trick r Treat.

  • Microplasticbrain@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 months ago

    Doesn’t this imply that the flower is polinated by bird cocks. Think about it a bird fucks one flower or starts to before realizing, and then later he fucks annother flower thus spreading the pollen of the first flower.

    • kromem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      No, it just implies that it was adaptive to look like a bird.

      It could be for any number of reasons, including because aliens exist and years ago they were like “let’s screw up all the plants in this area for generations” until the leader’s kid saw one that kind of looked like little birds and threw themselves in front of it and said “wait, no, spare this one.”

    • OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Most flighted birds don’t actually have functional penis (ducks are a notable exception). Both the males and females reproduce through their cloaca.

  • Poogona [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    That question below is honestly a good way to demonstrate how bad people can be at understanding what would be called materialism without it being explained to them first

    Easy to assume the shape of that flower is due to decisions made by the plant itself instead of the more accurate way of understanding its shape being the result of external conditions and pressures acting upon the plant and its flower growth over a long time

  • 7heo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Why are people so unfathomably dumb, like, I’m afraid.

    • can@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      People don’t get the timescale of an evolutionary feature like this. And how long it was only kinda bird like.

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Intuitively understanstanding evolution is something most people dont need so i cant really fault people for it. But yeah either trolling or actually stupid who knows.

      • pooberbee (they/she)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I do wish that the personification of evolution wasn’t such a thing. People so often attribute reasoning or intention to the process, when there is no such thing.

        • kamenLady.@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          Wait until they advance and start thinking about things like, how did plants find out what bees like to eat. This will spook them to mind-blown town.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Intuitively understanstanding evolution is something most people dont need so i cant really fault people for it.

        LOL, how meta (“people haven’t evolved to understand evolution”).

  • ChowJeeBai@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    How do you know it’s not a bird trying to look like a plant? Y’know to evade predators and all…