Or something like that idk I’m not an expert

  • DarraignTheSane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What you’re describing is “NSFW” (not safe for work) vs. “NSFL” (not safe for life). NSFL covers the spectrum of anything that could be considered potentially psychologically harmful to someone who’s not desensitized to such traumatic things - gore, death, etc. Anything beyond standard nudity / intercourse porn can possibly fall into the NSFL category. For that matter, things that aren’t strictly porn can still fall into NSFW, since what’s acceptable at some people’s work may be stricter than others.

    Of course, all of that is dependent on the person submitting the content checking the right boxes. I do agree that the Lemmy devs need to add a NSFL tag to allow instances / communities who want to host such content to be able to delineate between that and NSFW.

    https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/NSFL
    https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=NSFL

    • comfort_zone@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think that distinction between “NSFW” and “NSFL” would be very useful to have. I often wished for that feature while browsing reddit.

      • DarraignTheSane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        People would sometimes “tag” it, but only insofar as adding it to the subject line of the post i.e. “[NSFL] - This person won a Darwin Award”. On reddit I always figured they didn’t add an explicit tag for it because then they’d be admitting that they hosted that kind of content, and reddit is ever increasingly concerned about its public image.