• CaptObvious@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    When Apple (and Microsoft, Google, and Amazon) are sitting on several trillion dollars, any country in the world would be hesitant to take them on. If they injected just 10% of their value, it would destabilize entire economies.

    • GissaMittJobb
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      Which is why we have the union of European countries taking them on as a group.

      It’s far from impossible to go against these big companies despite their size.

    • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      American corpo-propaganda. Apple doesn’t have land, doesn’t have guns, doesn’t have workers ready to die in combat. Their wealth is in IP, contracts, and (unusually) cash/stocks.

      The FTC could order a raid on their offices tomorrow, freeze their corporate accounts, and breakup the company into four smaller companies (say Apple Silicon, Apple Mobile, Apple Desktop, Apple Software). And there’s jack-shit Apple would do in retaliation. In fact, this used to be a semi-common antitrust strategy until Reagan came about.

      The only thing truly preventing state intervention is neoliberal/libertarian/corporations-as-people ideology. That’s the real enemy that turns politicians impotent and complacent. But it’s a made-up, self-inflicted weakness.

    • crispy_kilt@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      That’s why we have the EU. It’s not one country, it’s 27, with one sixth of the global economy (26 trillion). That’s far larger than even the largest companies.