• Thrillhouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    10 months ago

    It is just common sense. Nations never do things for just one reason. Possession is 9/10ths of the law - if they fill Antarctica with their facilities they can later claim they have so many facilities they should just govern Antarctica. Not a bad strategic move in times of global warming.

    • aberrate_junior_beatnik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      There are dozens of research stations. Argentina has 14. The US also has 5 research stations and makes up one quarter of the summer population (China makes up 4%). Don’t see any articles hand-wringing about US ambitions in the region, for some reason.

      • set_secret@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Australia has already claimed 42% of the continent fwiw. yes when climate change makes the rest of the world unliveable Aus 2.0 is waiting just down the road.

      • Thrillhouse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah because the US is the ally of my country. Geopolitically if you’re from a BRICS nation it’s not a concern. NATO and 5 eyes nations aren’t supportive of an ambitious China expanding influence and territory.

        • davelA
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          NATO/Five Eyes represents almost the entirety of the imperial core. They’re the real threat in the world. The imperial core caused WWI and WWII and Cold War I, and now they’re starting Cold War II.