• LiveLaughLoveRevenge
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 years ago

    While I wouldn’t want to wear an AVP around people, if someone came up to me it would be nice for them to know if I’m seeing them via passthrough or if I’m completely in VR

    • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I think its very odd that they managed to combine VR and google glass to some how come up with something even more off putting. Can’t wait to see someone wearing these while driving.

      • Moonrise2473
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        It’s going to be extremely stupid to drive or walk with one of this, no matter what apple marketing is saying, night time vision must suck, and peripheral vision is reduced.

        But at the same time there are people playing RPGs or watching movies while driving 90mph in highway using Tesla “full self” driving (then the surviving family has to sue “he didn’t know it wasn’t an autonomous vehicle”)

  • AClassyGentleman
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Oh hey Tim Cook tweeted a video ad about the nightmare goggles today and the first thing it showed was someone using them to work while barely paying attention to making their child breakfast.

    Very cool and good I love capitalism =^)

    • DebsOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Oh gawd no. Please. We can stop this. For our children. No one buy it.

      • hglman
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        You need them in order to be productive enough to keep that child alive.

  • datendefekt
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    To be fair, the technology is really fascinating. Virtual objects throwing shadows on the real environment or generating a virtual face in realtime is stunning. But on a practical note, does this keep your face from getting sweaty? Can you wear glasses comfortably? Can you change light seals when they get dirty?

    Nevertheless this is in effect just a glorified monitor, but will certainly cost several times more. So I really can’t imagine compelling use cases. Especially since you can only use it with other apple devices.

    • Heimchen
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The expensive Apple Monitor actually does not cost much more.

    • DrownedAxolotl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m just interested in seeing what sorts of games someone will develop for this. I imagine it’d be great.

      • datendefekt
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        At first, I wanted to reply “Gaming? On a Mac? Get out of here!”. But I just saw that over 38k games are available for MacOS in Steam - well, TIL!

  • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I just feel like VR is never really going to be a thing most people enjoy using. People have always used tools with their hands, the smartphone is just the most advanced version yet. Wearing something over your field of vision feels unnatural and unintuitive, and I don’t see that ever changing. I already feel kinda uncomfortable even when I just put my hoodie up. What if someone comes at me from behind 🫣

    • Serval@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      But we are still at the very beginning of this technology. People will start using them at home because they are more suitable than phones for some activities, but as usage increases there will also be more research on the subject - so technology can advance and become less invasive -. Once usage increases and the tool becomes less invasive, I see very few barriers to them spreading outside.

      • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Maybe they will, maybe they won’t. I definitely felt similarly to you for a while, but now I’m just kinda in a phase where I’m seeing the downsides too.

        I worry about the mental health of a society that spends more time on a headset than face to face with other human beings. It’s already really bad just with smartphones. VR is gonna be even more problematic, people are going to literally get addicted to VR and lose track of reality and go insane. Or at least I could see that outcome as a possibility.

        • Serval@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Sorry for the late reply.

          In my comment I wrote how I think this technology might spread, but this isn’t connected to the advantages and disadvantages I believe it has (rather to the advanced and disadvantages the public will perceive).

          I’m quite worried about the mental health consequences too, but I don’t think they’ll be enough to make us stop using VR if we find it convenient. I just hope for an increase in mental health awareness, so that even if new technologies do damage people will be able to prevent and cure a part of it.

    • Mojojojo1993
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Smartphones are kinda dumb though. As smart as they are they are a tiny screen you need to hold.

      Screens monitors tvs pads whatever are just glass that information is beamed onto.

      Why not just use that same tech to be that same information in front of your vision. Cut out the middle man that is the phone screen. Isn’t that better ?

      I’d love to have a heads up display but I don’t think it has much practical applications. Can see my heart rate my maybe my speed and my location of I need directions.

      This is the same revolution that were phones. People like you said the exact same thing. Be dumb to look at your phone all day. Yet here we are.

      Chicken and egg. Need the hardware to start off the software. Without useful reasons for it it will die. Price point too

      • art
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        There’s a big difference there. Before the smart phone we would use notepads. Writing things down on a little pad of paper is something we’ve done for 100s of years. We just swapped out the paper or booklet for a digital device.

        • Mojojojo1993
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          We used lots of things before the Smart phone. It’s evolving

  • soulless
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    AR stuff is cool, it really is, but this will not be something you wear around other people.

    Maybe in many years from now, once the technology has matured to where you can wear it as normal glasses or even contacts, but I just don’t think a lot of people will want to use these except as a novelty or for specific purposes like gaming and then they will be competing against Meta which is priced much lower.

    I’d still take a pair though if they were sold at a tenth of the price :)

    • Moonrise2473
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s mostly the rendered fake eyes displayed on the outside

  • suoko@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Google glassee? Hospitals

    Facebook glasses? A few skaters

    Cardboard? casual games for kids

    Oculus? Simulators

    This thing? Apple futuristic-wannbes fanboys

  • Mcballs1234
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m gonna be honest, google glass was a lot more practical than this, sure google glass was expensive and you got made fun of, but now we have vr headsets for the masses, would a google glass like device succeed if it was under 300$?