• Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    According to the article, some of the ships targets were carrying supplies to Yemen. Was this some kind of mistake? Is there missing context? If not, what is the point?

      • Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 months ago

        I mean, it does cite a state department and pentagon official as a source (lowest quality source imaginable), but provides no context. Literally the whole article is written as if Ansar Allah is just doing stuff because … reasons?

        Even their publicly stated goal of ending the war in Gaza is treated as a fringe opinion amongst US officials. “Some senior officials concede it is entirely possible the Houthis will stop if Israel does” --> Like wtf do you think the purpose of these attacks even is?

        As for ships carrying supplies to Yemen, there are 2 cited examples in the article. One was a ship heading to aden, which this article claims that Ansar Allah said was a mistake. The ship arrived at port and no crew was injured. Important context that CNN leaves out.

        The other was the Rubymar, which is owned by a company golden adventure shipping. This does not appear to be a mistake, as it is a UK company. It was also heading for a port in Bulgaria

        Doing this research took me literally just 10 minutes. CNN is a rag.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          9 months ago

          There’s a particularly funny bit in the article where it acknowledges that even some people in the admin acknowledge that support for the genocide is the reason Yemen is interdicting shipping. Also acknowledging that the attacks did indeed stop during the 7 day ceasefire. But then it just proceeds to dismiss all that. Absolute clown shit reporting.