by “very clear” you mean that you have facts to back your claims? because neither the Muller report nor anything/anyone i heard or read showed any conclusive evidence of what you enounce. Maybe you drank some propaganda-juice?

I believe Assange when he said WL was architecture in such way they couldn’t know the identity of their sources. Their unbroken record of source protection (unfortunatel C. Manning gave herself away by talking to this @#! snitch/lyer of Adrian Lamo…) asserts that hypothesis.

All information published by WL was proven to be authentic, truthful and of general interest. The DNCLeaks proved massive manipulations within the DNC including (but not limited to): downing Bernie Sanders as the natural candidate of the party, including with the use of anti-semitic slur, in the profit of Hillary Clinton; pumping Trump’s candidacy in the RNC as he would be “the only one we can beat”, with the catastrophic result the world witnessed and laughed/cried about for a long while.

Given that these informations were all truthful, where is any “sockupupeting”? isn’t sockpupetting when false information is being spread, hidden under respectable (or fake) identities? like when “WMD in Irak” is used to start a war for instance?