• displayerror@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 years ago

    There was a lot of backlash a week or two ago when Mullvad announced that they would stop supporting port forwarding, as it seems like many people who were using Mullvad for torrenting were doing so because of the support for port forwarding. I’m still using Mullvad even though I don’t port forward, but most of my torrenting is done through a separate seedbox.

    • tetris11
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      I don’t get the port forwarding issue. If I’m torrenting something on port 78660 but my only outgoing ports visible to others is port 8081, then couldn’t I just tell my torrent software to use port 8081?

      I don’t really understand how torrenting is impacted by this, unless all torrent clients use a baked in port number (which from what I’ve seen over the last few decades, all torrent clients allow you to change the outgoing port)

        • tetris11
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          You lost me in that middle part. Are there any further resources I can read to understand this better?

            • tetris11
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              Oh I see!

              • Without port forwarding, you are a passive node that can only interact with active nodes but not other passive nodes.
              • With port forwarding, you are an active node that can interact with everyone (active + passive).
              • Passive nodes can upload/download but from fewer peers (only active nodes)
              • Active nodes can upload/download but from everyone