The Federal Trade Commission complained to a federal appeals court on Wednesday that Microsoft’s layoff of 1,900 employees in its video games division went against its representations in court as it fought to acquire Activision Blizzard. The move undermines Microsoft’s claims that the companies would continue to operate independently, the FTC said, and will make it harder to get “effective relief” if the agency succeeds in its administrative proceeding.
  • Treczoks@kbin.social
    103·
    11 months ago

    As if they would care. What is the FTC going to do about it? Most likely do nothing, or issue a stern warning.

      • Treczoks@kbin.social
        34·
        11 months ago

        Yes, of course they have complained to the courts. That’s not the point. This simply will go nowhere, or do you expect that the court will somehow separate Activision out of Microsofts hands again to fix this? Or punish the managers at Microsoft and make them withdraw the execution plan to remove redundant jobs?

        At the end of it, Microsoft will eventually pay a small, symbolic sum which they consider “cost of conducting business”. Nothing more.

        • bitcrafter@programming.devEnglish
          5·
          11 months ago

          Yes, of course they have complained to the courts. That’s not the point.

          That is moving the goalposts. In your other comment, you said, “What is the FTC going to do about it? Most likely do nothing, or issue a stern warning.” I have demonstrated that they are doing neither of these things but instead are going through the courts to get injunctive relief.

          This simply will go nowhere, or do you expect that the court will somehow separate Activision out of Microsofts hands again to fix this?

          If the appellate court decides that the lower court erred in its reasoning, then there is no reason why it could not issue such an order. It is not like this would be the first time that the government broke up a company.

          Or punish the managers at Microsoft and make them withdraw the execution plan to remove redundant jobs?

          There is no reason why the court could not issue an injunction preventing it from executing this plan until the proceeding concludes.

          At the end of it, Microsoft will eventually pay a small, symbolic sum which they consider “cost of conducting business”. Nothing more.

          If the FTC considered this to be a sufficient remedy then they probably would have settled with Microsoft by now rather than taking this to the courts.

        • GrundlButter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          2·
          11 months ago

          As pessimistic as it sounds, I think you’re right. There’s likely some back pay they will have to give to the workforce they fired, which is a pittance compared to what they stand to earn as they milk their purchase dry.

          • bitcrafter@programming.devEnglish
            2·
            11 months ago

            If the appellate court is unhappy with the lower court’s ruling, then there is no reason for it not to reverse it and tell Microsoft to stop the process of merging with Activision until the proceedings have completed. Admittedly this outcome might be inconvenient for Microsoft and Activison, but it is not the job of the court to care about this.