• kurcatovium@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    Surely a reputable source and the numbers are definitely not made up.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Ah yes, IMF and Financial Times, two organizations notoriously famous for spreading Russian propaganda. The levels of delusion within the Western world are reaching new heights as mainstream media begins to acknowledge the truth behind the situation at hand. It’s truly a comical spectacle, with laughter being the only appropriate response. 😂

        • desentizised@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Serious question: How could ANY economy possibly grow when it is spending so much on something that only means death and destruction? The P in GDP stands for something that’s produced. Currently the main product of Russia is annihilation, something that should be pretty hard to sell at a profit. (And the rest would probably mostly be cheap oil and natural gas for those who still trade with Russia.)

          By the logic of that graphic (and please bear with me here): If Russia wasn’t currently killing its (former) UA brothers it would be growing even more because all that bloodmoney could be spent on productive things. No? Am I missing something here? Point being that if that was the case, that growth could have been achieved before 2022 and 2014 when there were no external conflicts.

            • desentizised@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              Yea I mean if we’re talking percentage then the (pre-2022) reference point is the size of Spain’s economy. And if it shrunk in 2022 then why shouldn’t it be able to grow by 3% while at war right?