• Darkenfolk@dormi.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    I mean you can simply read the article you yourself posted to see what I mean.

    How much more concrete than “there isn’t much depth to any of the articles content” do you want me to be?

    Instead of digging your heels in, stop with the article link-dumping.

    The latter is not just criticism on you but all the other “supposed” content sharers. If you can’t even be bothered to post a short summary of the content you post, why would I bother with clicking on it.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      After two days of going at this you’re still unable to articulate any actual point. Meanwhile, it’s an absurd demand that people chew up the content of the article and feed it to you like a baby bird. If you want to have a discussion then read the submissions and make concrete arguments regarding them. These sort of vapid comments just add noise as opposed to creating any meaningful discussion.

      • Darkenfolk@dormi.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        The point was quite clear, I’m not going to feed it to you like a baby bird and I’m not going to waste more time on that, just saying “nu uh explain yourself” doesn’t change anything on that front.

        And it’s not absurd to expect people to actually post content instead of just dumping their latest fancy somewhere. We got bots that can do the same.

        A post with real content like a summary or even a decent title with a synopsis are a sign for me that the content is worth consuming, instead of just more noise that dilutes existing content actually worth reading.