• filoriaOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    American lunar capabilities have atrophied while India and China are speeding ahead. The last controlled American moon landing (crewed or uncrewed) was Apollo 17. In 1972.

    And people believe that Artemis 3 will happen next year

    • Candelestine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Atrophied…? It’s a private company that NASA helped fund to help develop their own, independent capabilities. The private sector is always less careful, this should not be surprising.

      There’s a whole different private American company launching their own attempt next month or something.

      There’s more lenses to look through asides the lens of nationalism.

      • filoriaOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        34
        ·
        1 year ago

        A government-funded project, carrying a government-funded payload, launched by a government-funded rocket.

        bUt ItS pRiVaTe

        • athos77@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 year ago

          So by that logic, if the government charters a bus to carry some government scientists and their government-funded research projects to a conference that the government has partially funded, and the bus crashes on the way to the conference, then the government is responsible for the bad brakes on the bus? How does that make sense?

          • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The government has given at least one direct or indirect subsidy to OP, so therefore anything OP does wrong can be blamed on the government! Hooray!

          • filoriaOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            If the bus manufacturer and bus operator is funded by the government, absolutely.

          • hglman
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah because the government is responsible for road saftey…

              • hglman
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Which is not allowed and should have more oversight to prevent.

        • Candelestine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Put some in front of each of those for actual accuracy. NASA does have projects it exclusively funds and controls.

          Those are not without failure either, of course, the Challenger disaster being a classic example. Details are important, at any rate.

        • 4am@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          More whaling for capital. “Won’t someone think of the shareholders!”

          The part that broke was built by a private company that took taxpayer dollars soo…. Seems like the free market is what failed here

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lol dude NASA has been landing on mars in that time, not sitting at home

    • zhunk@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      It wasn’t a NASA lander, it was an Astrobotic lander. NASA has been busy with Mars landings. The whole point of CLPS is to get cheaper missions by doing less micromanaging. We’ll see how Intuitive Machines does next.

      I don’t think anyone even moderately informed has though a 2025 Artemis 3 landing is realistic for years at this point. It sounds like the official delay announcement is coming soon.

    • Perfide@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This isn’t NASA, it’s a private company completely unrelated in anyway to the Artemis projects success chances. NASA meanwhile, has a great track record for landing stuff on mars, which is much harder

      That being said, no one who is actually following the Artemis project believes Artemis 3 will happen next year, we all know 2026 is the earliest it’ll be at this point.

      ETA: Annnddd it’s official, Artemis 2 delayed to 2025, Artemis 3 delayed to 2026.