• @poVoq
    link
    7
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

    • @k_o_t
      link
      12 years ago

      IPFS (which is also tightly interwowen with Filecoin)

      how so? all of these technologies rely on ipfs at their core but you can use them just fine without ever touching filecoin, or even knowing what filecoin is, and there are a lot of projects based on these, some of the ones I follow or know of

      anytype - uses textile, go-ipfs and ipfs-mobile, works like an note taking alternative to notion, except it has a ton of really cool capabilties like offline use, p2p sync between your devices, p2p and offline collaboration etc

      berty - p2p messenger that uses libp2p and ipfs-mobile that works offline, via bluetooth, on local networks etc

      peerpad - decentralized text collabortion (uses libp2p)

      dtube - decentralized youtube alternative that stores videos on ipfs

      • @poVoq
        link
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

        • @k_o_t
          link
          12 years ago

          most of these projects are separate from protocol labs, so if they seize to exist you can still be using these libraries/projects

          and while yes, they are definitely going to be leaning into filecoin, i don’t see this as a problem: part of the appeal of ipfs is its modularity and flexibility, for example, there’s a theoretical google docs-like ipfs-based app, and they’re offering either p2p sync or sync to an ipfs node on your own server, or they offer paid backups via filecoin, it’s a perfect business model in my opinion… many ipfs based projects have already adopted this model

          without its modularity and flexibility (purely restricted to filecoin) ipfs is nothing but a glorified storage solution, and would lose most of its appeal

          • @poVoq
            link
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            deleted by creator

            • @k_o_t
              link
              12 years ago

              by default ipfs doesn’t offer any data replication guarantees

              if you spin up a regular ipfs node and do nothing with it, you will get practically zero data flowing in and out of it, excluding a few kilobytes of metadata that is broadcasting your peer id to other nodes and downloading some distributed hashtable data about which nodes have what files

              you can pin any file, and then your node will broadcast that it has that file and others can now download it, if they choose to do so, and that file will remain on their computer for a few hours until garbage collection gets rid of it

              iiuc this is basically where “involuntary” data replication ends, so for your file to remain on ipfs you either have to pin it yourself, get others to get interested in it and also pin it, or pay a hosting provider to pin it for you, or use filecoin, but that comes with its whole separate api and other stuff

              about the ecological aspect of filecoin i’m not really sure, but I thought they aren’t using proof of work, rather proof of space, which doesn’t carry much ecological consequences, other than the energy to run the drives and the computer they’re attached to, but since these drives are used for legitimate applications of storing data, it’s not any worse environmentally than any other cloud storage provider

              primarily benefits some of the worst venture capitalists

              was there some shady stuff going on? i’ve heard that filecoin has had some weird stuff going on, but never really paid close attention to it… in theory, though, filecoin should work against concentration of power in the hands of VCs and big companies, because even if there were one massive company that hosts 95 % of data using filecoin, there is no vendor lock in like there is with aws or google cloud, so anybody can come in and set up their filecoin operation, you only need to pay for hardware to enter the game and that’s it

              • @poVoq
                link
                2
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                deleted by creator

                • @k_o_t
                  link
                  2
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  but I guess you agree that a single node storage on IPFS doesn’t really have much positive advantage over just putting it on a basic http server?

                  same as with bittorrent? a single seeder isn’t much better than just setting up a regular http server, but if more people decide to download and seed it, then you have infinite horizontal scale in bandwidth and resilience, all in a decentralized manner, same thing with ipfs

                  it’s already been used for large scale backups by sci hub and libgen

                  This is also what I thought until I looked into the actual hardware requirements of Filecoin, which require a hoster to purchase the very latest AFAIK Intel based hardware (for the required cryptography).

                  i don’t really see a problem in that, if they are going to compete with enterprise grade storage offers then you need good hardware to run it

                  Filecoin has a really high overall storage need Vs. usable storage, something like 100:1 if I recall correctly.

                  that seems awfully high to have any semblance of practicality, could you provide a source on that?

                  Something like 30% of the total possible volume of Filecoins was pre-minted and exclusively sold to accredited investors, which primarily included some really shady venture capitalist firms.

                  yeah, pre-mining sucks, but that’s just how ICOs work, no?

                  • @poVoq
                    link
                    4
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    deleted by creator