For some reason, all tankies think there’s only two possibilities: either you support China or you support the U.S. Well, guess what? I don’t support either!
False. Your utopian handwave gesturing is not a reflection of reality, and thinking X or Y thing does not make it true, regardless of what you think in your head. There is only going to be a bipolar hegemonic world for the next century, atleast, and the two poles will be USA and China, leading West and East respectively. This is a hard, solid fact that anyone who has studied enough politics, history and current affairs acknowledges.
If you are not picking sides in this particular case, that only means you are satisfied with the current global hegemon and its doings. And therefore, you generally support USA over China. (This is also apparent by your repeated baseless hinting at China being a dictatorial one man show. If dictatorships were so good and strong, dozens of them in the past would not have succumbed on their own.) This diplomatic weaseling of “both sides bad” does not work because the third option does not exist, atleast for the next 100 years.
Are you sure? Chinese people aren’t even allowed to complain about government policies, are they? There’s only one person who has a voice: Xi Jinping.
It tells how much you know about China, or have bothered to read about China without reading about them through the Western imperialist propaganda media ecosystem. It is pointless to correct you because you are already using the “tankie” label, and the next labels you will use are “wumao”, “50 cent”, “CCP shill” and so on. It is a typical pattern for any brainwashed and morally bankrupt person (usually Westerners) at this point.
It also proves you are an Anglo-Saxon cheerleader.
Again, tankie groupthink: either China or the U.S. Plus ad hominem.
How to look hypocritical, incorrect and bad together with one reply 101
Further engagement seems like a waste of time, since you are not in for academic engagement, so I will stop here.
False. Your utopian handwave gesturing is not a reflection of reality, and thinking X or Y thing does not make it true, regardless of what you think in your head. There is only going to be a bipolar hegemonic world for the next century, atleast, and the two poles will be USA and China, leading West and East respectively. This is a hard, solid fact that anyone who has studied enough politics, history and current affairs acknowledges.
If you are not picking sides in this particular case, that only means you are satisfied with the current global hegemon and its doings. And therefore, you generally support USA over China. (This is also apparent by your repeated baseless hinting at China being a dictatorial one man show. If dictatorships were so good and strong, dozens of them in the past would not have succumbed on their own.) This diplomatic weaseling of “both sides bad” does not work because the third option does not exist, atleast for the next 100 years.
It tells how much you know about China, or have bothered to read about China without reading about them through the Western imperialist propaganda media ecosystem. It is pointless to correct you because you are already using the “tankie” label, and the next labels you will use are “wumao”, “50 cent”, “CCP shill” and so on. It is a typical pattern for any brainwashed and morally bankrupt person (usually Westerners) at this point.
How to look hypocritical, incorrect and bad together with one reply 101
Further engagement seems like a waste of time, since you are not in for academic engagement, so I will stop here.
deleted by creator