• Cowbee [he/they]
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I mostly agree, the issue is that the majority of what gets called support for Putin isn’t support for Putin, but alignment against NATO. There are legitimate supporters of Putin among some few MLs, but what I personally have noticed more is anti-NATO statements being called pro-Putin, because Putin standa against NATO.

    The opposite is also common, going against Putin can often get conflated with being pro-NATO.

    • Stovetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I get that. I suppose in this case I just don’t sympathize with the “enemy of my enemy” perspective because Putin and the neo-aristocratic oligarchs who surround him are still enemies of Marxist ideology.

      • Cowbee [he/they]
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        If we just look at Lemmygrad’s Prolewiki, they outline their stance on the Russian Federation and the Russo-Ukranian War. You can examine that as much as you want, they acknowledge that Putin is a bourgeois dictator, but also go off of Lenin’s definition of Imperialism and find that the current RF doesn’t fit it, due to their production. That doesn’t mean they justify the RF’s invasion, they outright call it out, but also try to understand the reasons the invasion happened in the first place.

        They outright state that they support revolution within Russia against the Capitalist dictatorship, and showcase how the people are unhappy with the current system.

        I may not agree with their overall analysis, but this is absolutely not the viewpoint of a right winger, which means they can be swayed.