Following heavy criticism regarding anti-repair practices on the iPhone 13 lineup, Apple has just announced its Self Service Repair program. The company shared earlier that it wouldn’t be disabling Face ID after third-party screen repairs, after online outrage. The Cupertino giant is now taking an unexpected step further and making repairs easily accessible to individuals.

In a newsroom post, Apple has stated that iPhone 12 and iPhone 13 users will be able to order genuine spare parts and tools to repair their own iPhones. The move is unprecedented by Apple, but it’s most definitely a welcome one that will help dodge anti-trust lawsuits.

Clearly, without lawsuits and pressure groups, this would never have changed. Whilst I really love some of what Apple does (very long software update cycles, the best health smartwatch, etc) there is also a lot I really dislike (a crippled Shortcuts app, iCloud web apps that lack features, Photos is dismal compared to Google Photos, etc). So this is yet another incremental improvement (like widgets, 3rd party keyboards and browsers, copy-and-paste, etc that eventually arrived).

See https://www.xda-developers.com/apple-now-lets-you-repair-your-own-iphone/

#technology #righttorepair #iphone #DIY

  • HiddenLayer5
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 years ago

    The glued together, incredibly hard to disassemble, everything proprietary iPhone. Yeah no this isn’t nearly enough.

    • GadgeteerZAOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      Too true… but for many manufacturers and that needs to change. I’d rather have a phone 2 mm thicker if I can replace the battery etc. But even my Nexus 6P had to be opened with a heat gun to get everything out to change the battery.

      • HiddenLayer5
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        Removable batteries (without tools) and screw-based assembly need to be legally mandated. If you can’t make a device that’s both sleek and repairable, then you can’t make it sleek.

        • GadgeteerZAOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 years ago

          Yes I’d gladly sacrifice an extra 1 or 2 mm thickness for that. We’d lose waterproofness I suppose but I’ve really neve rhad to make use of that.

          • sexy_peach@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 years ago

            Honestly I am not convinced that they couldn’t build a waterproof and has a replaceable battery.

            • GadgeteerZAOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 years ago

              Generally removable back covers are not waterproof, hence the glue… I do remember Samsung years ago having rubber rings of some sort, but it was very basic water resistance as I recall. I’m not sure the reason is to have waterproofness though, as most users probably don’t need that (I’ve never dropped my phone in a toilet, but once many years ago mine did fall out of a top pocket and into a swimming pool, but I managed to catch it as it went under).

          • HiddenLayer5
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 years ago

            There are robust waterproof cases for the few times you need it.

            • GadgeteerZAOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 years ago

              Exactly, and which probably do a better more secure job when you really need it.