• PeterPoopshit
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m waiting for a historian to come along and be like “uuhm ACKTUALLY…”

    One one hand, feudalism could be abused just as easily, if not more easily than deregulated capitalism can be. On the other hand, governments and rich people didn’t have the technology we have today which probably made it harder to enforce really dumbass shit.

    • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      My understanding is that they medieval peasants were given a lot of free time because it was recognized that they’d revolt otherwise. Maybe we need to reinstate that fear.

      • PeterPoopshit
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not having armies powerful enough with high-tech enough technology to defeat even god himself probably had a lot to do with it as well. Today it doesn’t matter if the poor people start revolting, they can just mow them down with drone strikes and machine guns if it gets too out of hand.

      • PorkrollPosadist
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Peasants engaged primarily in agricultural labor, and there are significant parts of the year where there is no productive agricultural work to be done. While other trades and crafts existed (cobblers, tanners, blacksmiths, tailors, physicians, carpenters, masons, etc) they were an insignificant portion of the total economic landscape.

        • Ado
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Please at least tell me those non-agri workers were as miserable as me

          /s