@RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to World News • 6 months agoRichest 1% account for more carbon emissions than poorest 66%, report sayswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square46fedilinkarrow-up1417arrow-down111cross-posted to: socialismglobalnews@lemmy.zipnews@hexbear.netnews@beehaw.orgworld@lemmy.worldfinance@beehaw.orgeconomicsenvironment@beehaw.org
arrow-up1406arrow-down1external-linkRichest 1% account for more carbon emissions than poorest 66%, report sayswww.theguardian.com@RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to World News • 6 months agomessage-square46fedilinkcross-posted to: socialismglobalnews@lemmy.zipnews@hexbear.netnews@beehaw.orgworld@lemmy.worldfinance@beehaw.orgeconomicsenvironment@beehaw.org
minus-squareDizzy Devil DuckylinkfedilinkEnglish2•6 months agoLess kids means less money spent and more money saved in the long run, so yeah.
Not having kids affects how rich you are ?
Less kids means less money spent and more money saved in the long run, so yeah.
So kids have négative value?
Depending on who you ask, yes.