RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to World News · 1 year agoRichest 1% account for more carbon emissions than poorest 66%, report sayswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square45fedilinkarrow-up1417arrow-down111cross-posted to: socialismglobalnews@lemmy.zipnews@hexbear.netnews@beehaw.orgworld@lemmy.worldfinance@beehaw.orgeconomicsenvironment@beehaw.org
arrow-up1406arrow-down1external-linkRichest 1% account for more carbon emissions than poorest 66%, report sayswww.theguardian.comRandAlThor@lemmy.ca to World News · 1 year agomessage-square45fedilinkcross-posted to: socialismglobalnews@lemmy.zipnews@hexbear.netnews@beehaw.orgworld@lemmy.worldfinance@beehaw.orgeconomicsenvironment@beehaw.org
minus-squareinterdimensionalmemelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoNot having kids affects how rich you are ?
minus-squareDizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoLess kids means less money spent and more money saved in the long run, so yeah.
minus-squareDizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoDepending on who you ask, yes.
Not having kids affects how rich you are ?
Less kids means less money spent and more money saved in the long run, so yeah.
So kids have négative value?
Depending on who you ask, yes.