CNN’s Wolf Blitzer seemed at a lost of words at the justification being used to bomb a refugee camp in Gaza.

  • @HowMany
    link
    46 months ago

    Define “liberal”. Then maybe the rest of what you said can fall in place.

    • A Phlaming Phoenix
      link
      fedilink
      246 months ago

      Not OP but I think they meant supporters of neoliberal economic policy and somewhat progressive social policies. “Liberal” like American liberal politics. The point being that they think they have good politics because they think trans people are people and aren’t the kind of right wing fanatic we get a lot of. They’re “left” to the extent that the American political spectrum allows for without understanding what “left” actually means, without being conscious of the overarching machinations that make then think their politics are good even as they continue to feed a system that intentionally blinds them to any honest criticism.

      • @corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        36 months ago

        supporters of neoliberal economic policy and somewhat progressive social policies. "

        There’s nothing progressive about airstrikes on civilians. Never has been.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
          link
          -26 months ago

          The somewhat progressive social policies are reserved for the domestic market. Statistically, US democrats are the party who starts wars and UK liberals always support these wars as we saw with Iraq and Afghanistan.

      • @HowMany
        link
        -116 months ago

        neoliberal economic policy

        ??? which means… what, exactly?

        “Liberal” like American liberal politics.

        ??? You mean like the broad spectrum of … whom, exactly?

        the definition of liberal is caring what gender someone is or isn’t…?

        You haven’t begun to define the terms and ideology of what being a “liberal” means. I don’t mean to drop your sails, but you spent a lot of words saying nothing.

        I again ask - define “liberal”.

        • @Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          06 months ago

          I wrote a long bit explaining what they really mean with reference to Phil Ochs and all the contradictions and contrarianism involved in people who use liberal as a slur, it’s not worth it though because the real answer is ‘too left = tankie, not left enough = liberal, everyone is bad and should be ignored except for me’

    • @Omega_Haxors
      link
      -2
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Liberal: White, far-right, genocidal, usually rich and supports literal nazis because their opponents are communists.

      In a modern day context: Supports Ukraine because they’re white and full of nazis, supports Israel because they’re white and full of nazis.

        • @Omega_Haxors
          link
          2
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I fucking hate this so much. Anyone whose against nazis in Ukraine must automatically be a russia apologist. There is zero other explanation. Flat out the one case where they can flat out support nazism and then spin it like you’re the one whose problematic for calling it out.

          You do realize how dangerous that is, right? Remember how Prager U called everyone they didn’t like communists and they were so universally disliked that it resulted in a huge surge in people identifying as communist? What makes you think this won’t happen here?

          And that’s why they do it. It’s two fascist nations are fighting, they want you to pick a side because regardless of which one you do, they win.

      • @Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        06 months ago

        Pretty sure they ment left wing liberal, you’re thinking more of libertarian I think? Or are you just really deep in the chamber?

              • @Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                06 months ago

                Only if the rest of the world is China and Cuba. Sure they’re not very left wing but slightly right of centre is far more accurate than ‘far right’

                • @thecrotch@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  16 months ago

                  In theory maybe. In practice china is to the right of the US. They’re a hypercapitalist oligarchy wearing an “I’m totes a communist” hat.

                  • @Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    0
                    edit-2
                    6 months ago

                    Ok so the democrats are far right, China is further right and I guess South Korea or somewhere is off the map and out the building.

                    I really don’t think just calling everyone we have a disagreement with right wing as if it’s a synonym for evil is an especially useful strategy.

                    Because like I know it’s hard to hear but the Scandinavian countries are pretty shitty too in a lot of ways. UK and most the EU is right of the democrats, even Kier (labour leader) is to the right of Biden.

                    We’re going to have to say Christiania is centrist at this rate.