Socialism has garbage marketing, full stop. Probably because those who specialize in marketing tend to thrive in, and thus gravitate to, capitalist frameworks. Consequentially, a great many members of the working class are propagandized into reflexive rejection of socio-economic policies that would greatly benefit them, based on taboo buzzwords and false equivalences.
Yes, established terminology is quite useful for nuanced discussion in leftist spaces, among those who understand the distinctions between “communism”, “socialism”, “democratic socialism”, “social democracy”, “command economy”, “State capitalism”, and “totalitarian dictatorship”. But for many people, those are all synonyms. “Socialism” means gulags and breadlines and the government stealing your stuff to give it to slackers.
I propose a reactionary framework. A movement committed to abandoning familiar terminology in favor of capitalist buzzwords. Driving a wedge between “capitalism” and “market economies”, leveraging discontent of blue collar workers against big business and political cronyism.
It’s not universal healthcare, it’s alleviating the unfair healthcare burden on small businesses. It’s not universal welfare, it’s freeing business owners by replacing the minimum wage with a prosperity dividend. It’s not a socialized workplace, it’s an equity compensation initiative.
The established terms are poisoned, but the actual concepts are widely popular, if you phrase them right. The movement cannot thrive by trying to carve out a portion of the “leftist” party, it has to draw support from the entire working class. The only way to accomplish this is by abandoning the poisoned terms in favor of business terms that cannot be twisted by capitalists without destroying their own platform.
Thoughts?
deleted by creator
@agamemnonymous i see your point tho i will push back a little bit on the idea of waiting for the elderly reactionaries to die out.
i actually advocate the idea of getting involved in your local left as soon as possible to gain experience in the class struggle
I understand, but still believe that focuses on siphoning voters purely from the left, which relatively empowers the right. My approach relies on pulling voters from the right as well by an intelligently developed platform, creating a viable third party instead of splitting what “left” party presently exists into a politically impotent leftist party and a politically impotent liberal party, forfeiting every election to a psychotic neofascist party by default.
Meaningful engagement of the nominally right wing proletariat is absolutely crucial. You just have to meet them where they live with terms they haven’t been indoctrinated to hate reflexively.