Fedi.Tips (@feditips@mstdn.social)
mstdn.social
I don't think people are realising the danger the Fediverse is in. The only thing stopping corporations and VCs taking over this place is that the Fediverse is spread out on many different servers, which makes it very difficult to purchase. If most of the Fediverse ends up on mastodon.social, which is now a strong possibility, there will be nothing to stop most of it being sold to Musk or Zuckerberg or whoever. The bigger mastodon.social becomes, the more likely a buyout is to happen. (1/4)
  • federico3
    2·
    2 years ago

    The protocol could require “dual-homing” user accounts, where each account is automatically replicated on 2 different instances without need for hacks and workarounds. That would prevent users from losing their account if an instance is shut down, and also make it easy to migrate to a new instance without losing followers etc. The clients following your account always check for updates on both instances and if you move one of your accounts they update automatically.

    (This would not create significant additional load on the network: your toots are already being replicated on all instances where you have followers.)

    IMHO, you can only provide tools

    No, tools are rarely “neutral”. They encourage or discourage workflows and behaviors.

    • Grouchy@hub.grouchysysadmin.com
      2·
      2 years ago

      @federico3

      The protocol could require “dual-homing” user accounts, where each account is automatically replicated on 2 different instances without need for hacks and workarounds. That would prevent users from losing their account if an instance is shut down, and also make it easy to migrate to a new instance without losing followers etc. The clients following your account always check for updates on both instances and if you move one of your accounts they update automatically.

      Sounds like Nomadic identity from the Hubzilla and Streams projects.