I am not defending the MRM, but the quoted language is of a divisive character that propels reactionary fervor.
The valid antagonist is the political movement framed around a narrative that society favors women, not a simple recognition that men may have legitimate grievances deserving to be noticed.
I am not defending the MRM, but the quoted language is of a divisive character that propels reactionary fervor.
The valid antagonist is the political movement framed around a narrative that society favors women, not a simple recognition that men may have legitimate grievances deserving to be noticed.