• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    That’s not my opinion, that’s actual documented history. I’m simply providing context for the horrors she describes.

    • pingveno
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Then provide it in the comments maybe? All that I am saying is that you really should not be putting your words in her mouth in a way that suggests that it is coming from her. It is deceptive, whereas a comment makes it transparent where the analysis is coming from.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m not putting words into anybody’s mouth. If I titled it as Gayle says that US turned Japan into a modern hellhole with the Plaza Accord then you might have a point.

        • pingveno
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          The title is generally assumed to reflect the contents of the article. There’s a reason many political communities have taken to requiring that posts only use the headline of the article for the post title. It’s because some users editorialize the hell out of the title. The title is to describe the submission. The comment section is to discuss it.

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            The title is often used to provide context and opinion associated with the linked content. The original title isn’t going anywhere, it’s present in the article itself.