• Sh3Rm4n
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Great. Finally a sane, almost friendly answer of yours. Very rare occasion.

    Russia was perfectly fine trading with the west while fighting a war in Ukraine.

    Yes of course, why wouldn’t Russia be fine? But you also have to acknowledge that Russia prepared for that economic war well before the current conflict. And even though EU might have started the economic war, Russia started the decrease of delivery of gas to pressure the EU.

    But of course it is mostly the EUs fault to so heavily rely on Russia gas in the first place. In hindsight the signals of the geopolitical shift Russia took where clear even before 2014 but the EU ignored them.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      The original point was that EU started the economic war which is now destroying EU. This was not the fault of Russia. Glad you’ve finally managed to acknowledge that.

      • Sh3Rm4n
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        But this is where we disagree. The EU sanctioned Russia which did exclude things like gas.

        It is very much Russias fault that those prices are going up now as it stopped the delivery of gas.

        But that is not to say that the EU could’ve known better.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          It doesn’t matter what EU chose to sanction. EU started an economic war with Russia, and Russia responded. If you punch me in the face and I proceed to kick you in the balls, that’s not me starting the fight.

          • Sh3Rm4n
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            Oh it does. And also it does matter because Russia started the war. The sanctions where the response.

            So Russia was the face puncher while Europe the ball kicker to stay in your analogy.

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 years ago

              Sanctions were a poorly thought out response. Russia started a conflict in Ukraine, and Europe chose to participate in that conflict by sanctioning Russia. Once Europe became a party to the conflict, Europe can no longer complain that Russia is retaliating against Europe economically. This is a fight Europe chose and these are the consequences.

              • Sh3Rm4n
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 years ago

                Europe can no longer complain that Russia is retaliating against Europe economically.

                But it can, the same as Russia can complain that NATO members are supporting Ukraine.

                This is a fight Europe chose and these are the consequences.

                True. But this fight was chosen in response to Russias agression. Diplomatic solutions before the war failed because of Russias maximalist claims.

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  But it can, the same as Russia can complain that NATO members are supporting Ukraine.

                  It can complain all it likes, but the fact is that Europe chose to start an economic war with Russia and it is losing this war. Meanwhile, Russia is systematically destroying the Ukrainian army and NATO weaponry in Ukraine instead of complaining.

                  True. But this fight was chosen in response to Russias agression. Diplomatic solutions before the war failed because of Russias maximalist claims.

                  If I punch your friend in the face and you choose to stab yourself in the gut that’s a response. It’s just not a smart response. Meanwhile, Russia asked for very reasonable things such as Ukraine being neutral and implementing Minsk agreements which both Ukraine and NATO agreed to. If you think that’s Russia being maximalist then you have no clue.

                  • Sh3Rm4n
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 years ago

                    It can complain all it likes, but the fact is that Europe chose to start an economic war with Russia and it is losing this war.

                    Europe responded with sanctions because of Russias war. Economic wise both sides are losing. The intertwined economy between Russia and the EU is breaking up hard.

                    If I punch your friend in the face and you choose to stab yourself in the gut that’s a response. It’s just not a smart response.

                    The EU did not stab itself. You fail to see that the current economic difficulties in the EU do come from the fact that they try to be dependent of Russia energy deliveries (besides the fact that the delivery stopped mostly). Geopolitically if the EU is smart in future investments it will be more resilient and self-sufficient regarding energy resources. But this is not solved by buying gas from the US and Saudi Arabia.

                    The reason the economy is suffering so hard is the pace of the break-up. Generally the direction of being less reliant on gas is a good decision.