A joint U.S.-Mexico topographical survey found that 787 feet of the 995-feet-long buoy line set up by Texas are in Mexico.

  • PowerCrazy
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    Sounds like if the Sovereign Nation of Mexico is as upset about them as you are, they should go remove them.

    • some_guy@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      But

      A natural land border augmented with a fence isn’t an international incident

      • PowerCrazy
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        The subject of this post is that “nearly 80%” of the border fence is in Mexico’s Sovereign border, so I don’t see the issue with them removing the trespassing part of the fence.

          • PowerCrazy
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            In the sense that we are all international citizens and that any action by anyone near any border is an international “incident”, sure I guess.

            But if you want to be honest and acknowledge that calling something an “international incident” is a pretty loaded term, then I would say absolutely not.

            • some_guy@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Im not sure I understand. You don’t think forcing another nation to clean up a mess we made is enough of an international incident to be called an international incident?

              • nxdefiant@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                There’s a reason the government started calling unidentified flying objects “Unidentified Aerial Phenomena”.

                Would that definitely be an occurrence between two countries? Yes.

                Would that be an “international incident”? Maybe.

              • PowerCrazy
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                A friend of mine has land up in vermont that borders canada. Directly behind his property line is Canada. If I take a beer can and throw it into Canada, is that an “international incident”?

                Is the collapsing fence that quite possibly goes into the Canadian border illegal? Is it an “international incident?”

                • some_guy@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  There’s a news report about 80% of Vermont’s trash winding up in Canada, is that not an international incident?

                  I’m just trying to understand your own words, and you’re getting worked up. What do you think the words “international incident” mean?

                  • PowerCrazy
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    The Cuban Missile Crisis, A U2 being shot down in Soviet Air Space, trash being blown into Canada, are these things equivalent to you?