A joint U.S.-Mexico topographical survey found that 787 feet of the 995-feet-long buoy line set up by Texas are in Mexico.

  • PowerCrazy
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    The subject of this post is that “nearly 80%” of the border fence is in Mexico’s Sovereign border, so I don’t see the issue with them removing the trespassing part of the fence.

      • PowerCrazy
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        In the sense that we are all international citizens and that any action by anyone near any border is an international “incident”, sure I guess.

        But if you want to be honest and acknowledge that calling something an “international incident” is a pretty loaded term, then I would say absolutely not.

        • some_guy@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Im not sure I understand. You don’t think forcing another nation to clean up a mess we made is enough of an international incident to be called an international incident?

          • nxdefiant@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            There’s a reason the government started calling unidentified flying objects “Unidentified Aerial Phenomena”.

            Would that definitely be an occurrence between two countries? Yes.

            Would that be an “international incident”? Maybe.

          • PowerCrazy
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            A friend of mine has land up in vermont that borders canada. Directly behind his property line is Canada. If I take a beer can and throw it into Canada, is that an “international incident”?

            Is the collapsing fence that quite possibly goes into the Canadian border illegal? Is it an “international incident?”

            • some_guy@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              There’s a news report about 80% of Vermont’s trash winding up in Canada, is that not an international incident?

              I’m just trying to understand your own words, and you’re getting worked up. What do you think the words “international incident” mean?

              • PowerCrazy
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                10 months ago

                The Cuban Missile Crisis, A U2 being shot down in Soviet Air Space, trash being blown into Canada, are these things equivalent to you?

                • some_guy@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  You’re arguing for states having free reign to fuck with international entities by doing whatever they want - up to, but not including, the Cuban missile crisis?

                  • PowerCrazy
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 months ago

                    Absolutely not. I’m saying that trash on an international border isn’t an international incident unless you are trying to make mountains out of mole hills. Neither is building a fence there.