• Lenins2ndCat
    link
    142 years ago

    I really don’t think that’s a constructive response to someone pointing out you’re doing soft holocaust denial. It’s pretty concerning behaviour actually. Weakening and misusing words like genocide and fascism actively helps fascists.

      • Lenins2ndCat
        link
        15
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Either be accepted as a trusted source of knowledge or insight

        This is a very liberal attitude. CNN is a “trusted source of knowledge or insight” to millions of people but should it be? Absolutely fucking not.

        The merit of what is being said and the evidence presented stands on its own, regardless of the source it is coming from. You should just content on merit, not on institutions and positions with manufactured prestige.

        This whole mindset is what leads people to blindly believing anything they see from xyz source even when those sources put out mountains and mountains of absolute bullshit all the time.

        In this very thread you have lied more than once, linking to content from russian state media with the claim that it says something it does not. That is a fact and not at all “ad hominem”. Debatebro rubbish also became cringe at least a decade ago.

          • Lenins2ndCat
            link
            132 years ago

            See this shit here is worse than the shit that the admins have been tone policing people for. This is just intentionally inflammatory, adds nothing, and is participation in completely bad faith. Jog on mate.

      • Oatsteak
        link
        fedilink
        92 years ago

        “If you want to change MY mind you gotta be an authority figure or threaten me!” — a free thinker