• @fishtacos
      link
      410 months ago

      The people you wish to dunk on built this platform. Feel free to leave…

        • @fishtacos
          link
          010 months ago

          Sounds like a threat. Fuck off.

          • @pinkdrunkenelephants@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            110 months ago

            Sounds like you need to get the last word to win something, and you’ll prove that you need the last word by running your mouth again. Here, go ahead:

      • @socsa
        link
        -510 months ago

        First, I will take the compliment with grace.

        Second, this forum deserves a better class of communist. This shit is just intellectually lazy.

        • @fishtacos
          link
          110 months ago

          Who were you replying too? Lost? Got a bit overzealous with your keyboard warrior persona today?

          • @socsa
            link
            -210 months ago

            Nah, this shit is broken on mobile and I can’t see the context of my own comments for some reason. Sometimes when I hit context it shows me random comments under the same parent.

            But bro you are on the same website having the same conversation I am lmao.

        • @OurToothbrushM
          link
          0
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Most socialists are people in the global south. Their projects that “tankies” support are actually being done. Most of this “you’re a tankie” shit stems from western chauvinist white man’s burden shit. Call us when you’ve done a successful socialist revolution, until then we’re going to be emulating the ideologies of successful socialist projects.

          Edit: because lol “the US did a revolution” , read “the counter revolution of 1776”

          • @socsa
            link
            -1
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            So engaging in violence is the determining factor for determining who can have opinions?

            That’s great news, because Marx drew pretty heavily from the French and US revolutions when discussing his own revolutionary framework. Where do I pick up my badge?

            Edit - Just do a revolution! No not that way!

            • @OurToothbrushM
              link
              -3
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              So engaging in violence is the determining factor for determining who can have opinions?

              No, you are free to engage in revolutionary violence that results in a socialist society with a communist ruling party or elect your way into a socialist society with a communist ruling party. Plenty of socialists did the latter, they just didn’t live for long. If you do that I’ll gladly listen to you.

              • @socsa
                link
                -110 months ago

                Wow that kind of seems like a very narrow view of who can have a voice. It seems to exclude any socialist tradition which is skeptical of revolutionary praxis, or any statecraft which is not based on democratic centralism. Do I have that correct? You only find Orthodoxy and Leninism valid and are not interested in any forms of libertarian or democratic socialism?

                • @OurToothbrushM
                  link
                  -3
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Do you think only the successful revolutions have been orthodox marxist or orthodox ML?

                  You are free to follow the example of libertarian socialists and electoral socialists, but I’d prefer if you didn’t get yourself killed. Why do you only like ideologies that aren’t successful?

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
      link
      -510 months ago

      If you don’t like it here then feel free to go somewhere else. Lemmy was a community of sane people who were capable of having civilized discussion, and then a bunch of reddit chuds flooded here and started acting like you own the place. Get over yourself.

      • @DauntingFlamingo
        link
        0
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Bahaha look at you. “Everyone who disagrees with me is a bootlicker/troll/westerner.”

        Edit for the bootlicking troll below: Ahem A straw man fallacy is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction. One who engages in this fallacy is said to be “attacking a straw man”.

        You don’t understand what a straw man is.

        You’re really bad at this. You even tried to copy my comment and failed miserably! Congratulations, you’re stupid in two languages!

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
          link
          -810 months ago

          Bahaha look at you using straw man to attack me. Thanks for providing a good example of the kind of trolling I’m talking about.