What are your thoughts on post soviet Turkmenistan? Western media and “youtube historians” portray it as “evil north korea style totalitarian regime”. But if you look at the facts, we see that Turkmenistan, along with Belarus, is the only post soviet state that didnt mass privatize. Its first president himself, Saparmurat Niyazov, supported the failed 1991 August Coup that tried to save socialism and the USSR. After independence of Turkmenistan, communist rhethoric was replaced by conservative nationalist populism through his Democratic Party of Turkmenistan (DPT). Still, he did not follow western dictates. He refused to privatize anything or even impose market principles in the economy. To this day, Turkmenistans economy remains dominated by state owned planned economy, focused on exports of gas, oil and cotton (as in soviet times). Social welfare has remained extensive, with basic necessities like water, electricity, housing and gas being free for all citizens.

So, i was wondering, what do you think about Turkmenistan and its ruling DPT? They definetely arent socialist although they dont seem very capitalist either. What do you think?

Some sources on this that you can read (with a lot of skepticism cuz its wikipedia):

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_of_Turkmenistan

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saparmurat_Niyazov

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkmenistan

  • @ZeroGravity
    link
    52 years ago

    What is the revolutionary potential of such a country?

    • @SaddamHussein24@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      Revolutionary potential? Not much because its not socialist. But its still not fully capitalist either. I guess you could say its a weird mix of socialist economics and liberal politics. A strange type of state capitalism with extensive social welfare and central planning.